The debate to go to war with Iraq is a highly debated issue and the information presented points in the direction of hyp

Now there is definitely another side to this story. That would be the case supporting the war. Each day the U.S. waits gives Hussein another 24 hours to develop or stockpile his arsenal of deadly chemical, biological or nuclear weapons. This is why Secretary of State Colin Powell and his foreign policy team are working around the clock to get the United Nations Security Council to pass a resolution forcing Iraq to allow inspectors unfettered access to all sites where it might be developing weapons of mass destruction, or face possible consequences. Furthermore, Hussein has refused to grant United Nations inspectors complete access to facilities where such weapons might be in development. Removing Hussein from power will also help the world's economy by lowering the cost of petroleum. Hussein has a history of providing assistance to terrorists, and there is evidence that he has given aid and comfort to members of Osama bin Laden's al Qaeda network. For that reason, bringing Hussein to his knees will further the U.S. goal of destroying the terrorist network that organized the September 11 attacks.

ocrisy. Until the reasoning behind it is made clearer and makes sense, we should not go to war with Iraq. After the September 11th attac

Some topics in this essay:
Ritter UN, Removing Hussein, Security Council, United Bush's, Iraq UN, Iraq September, Middle East, Saddam Hussein’s, Dick Cheney, War Iraq, war iraq, weapons mass destruction, weapons mass, biological nuclear weapons, nuclear weapons, chemical biological nuclear, biological nuclear, chemical biological, mass destruction, bush administration, united nations, nation par, debate war iraq, attack country, country attack country,