2) The legal definition of impaired driving is if you can be found guilty of drunk driving, also called driving while intoxicated (DWI) or driving under the influence (DUI), if the state can prove either that you are legally intoxicated while driving, meaning that your body shows alcohol levels above a state-mandated limit. The most common level is .10 percent, as det

10) A pro argument for the drinking age to be 21 and over is most 21year olds are not living with there parents any more and are more mature than an 18 year old. Most likely a 21 year old has been on there own for about 3 years and an 18 year old is just leaving there parents house so they might get carried away with the freedom if they are allowed to start drinking right when they are about to leave there parents and head off to college. I believe alcohol consumption would still be used illegally but would not be over- used if it was legal for people who were 18 and over.

6) In the example that Det. Doug Jordan brought to class of the two brothers and the one friend who was later found out to be the drunk driver and not the one brother that the drunk driver set up, we find that it is important to examine the exterior (contact) damage of the vehicle(s), the interior (contact) damage to the vehicle(s), and the injuries sustained by the occupants of the vehicle. It is important to know the exterior damage of the vehicle so we know where the vehicle was impacted and which angle the driver and passenger(s) would of headed in the car. The interior damage to the vehicle is important because it tells us where the occupants of the vehicle might have hit in the car and if it would make sense with the exterior damage of the vehicle. The injuries of the occupants should match up to where they ended up in the car or out of the car by the interior damage to the car and exterior.

• Methods: I believe the most influential method I would use to impact this age group is to use pictures and stories of what happened. I also believe that bright young speakers who were the victims and perpetrator would be influential.

• Age: 2 target age groups of 14-18 and 18-20

I know I killed someone because of stupidity. I kept thinking it was and accident but since I have been thinking about this over and over again every day I realize it was not. I knew I was drunk and should not have been driving. I know that I should not have stepped foot in that car and that is why this was not a accident, this was a homicide crash that I caused. I sympathize with the family who lost there daughter’s life. I keep thinking “What If?” but I never thought this could happen to me and I deserve all that you will punish me for. I know if I had a daughter and she lost her daughter due to a drunk driver I would want justice served. I am truly sorry for all the pain I have caused her family and friends. I keep thinking about how lucky I am to be alive and I wish it would have been me instead of her. All I feel I can do is speak to target groups who tend to drink and drive and help prevent this.

• Incentives: This could stop someone from drinking and driving or stop a friend from drinking and driving.

• Consequences: In the program I would show the consequences of a number of different people who believed they could not be responsible for killing someone and how it was there fault. I would tell the class the different consequences from DUII to manslaughter prison time.(Lenzser)

2)RE: Taking a life and writing a letter to the sentencing judge.

Some topics in this essay:
Doug Jordan, Nigel Wrangham’s, Voas Fisher, Marie Armstrong, Se Laws, Brief Intervention”Hayes, , Marijuana” Rutledge, drunk driver, Chuck Hayes, drunk driving, drink drive, drinking driving, damage vehicle, driving impaired, bac equal, Visibility Enforcement, exterior damage vehicle, vehicle impact, crash person, real life, according voas fisher, crash person driving, voas fisher effective, commercial real life,