Who Killed Leigh Leigh
Who killed Leigh Leigh? Is a non-fiction text written by criminologist Kerry Carrington. The text explore many unanswered question regarding the rape and murder of 14 year old Leigh Leigh, that occurred on the third of November 1989, at a beach party in the small Industrial suburb of Stockton in Newcastle. At the beginning of the text Carrington states her purpose for which she wrote the book as that her ‘mission was to underscored by a passion that a system which had failed not only her (Robyn Leigh) daughter, but so many others, be exposed and brought to account’ pg xiii, by do this, she does not only disputed the legal system, but also raises other issues of gender, mateship, social standards, underage drinking, parental responsibilities, and even questioned the societies attitudes toward rape. Carrington positioned us to view these issues and feel morally out raged, shocked, and appalled through the functions of non-fiction that include persuasive techniques, use of language, the structure of the text and selection of detail.This Text is a carefully and thoughtfully researched study, not merely of a horrific crime, but of the culture and sub-cultures that lay behind it. Carrington writes of Stockton as being working
So, who killed Leigh Leigh? Who raped her? Carrington emphasis that nobody in town would reveal that. The text shows Australian 'mateship' at its very worse, men 'loyally' protecting their fellow men, even if they committed a horrific act of evil. Although 18-year-old Matthew Webster confessed to killing Leigh many questions remain unanswered. Was he protecting others because you don't dob in your mates? Who was responsible for raping Leigh prior to the murder? This are the questions Carrington positions us to ask ourselves, as she again and again keeps coming back to the issue ‘of what can happen when shame and mateship mix with a small-town mentality.’ By expressing this issue of mateship she comes back to how the societies influence on young teens perhaps resulted in the murder of Leigh, ‘The boys at this party were acting out their place in a gender order where the degradation of girls was in some sense natural to them. When expressing her views she uses emotional language and strong argument to get the reader to respond to what she implying. She emphasis the fact that people thought that Leigh ‘asked for it’ and that Matt Webster ‘was just being rough or just a boy or acting-out as a bloke with his mates and that was it.’ pg 133 By emphasing this you are positioned to ask yourself how could someone ask to be raped and how could they excuses a murderer. Though out the text Carrington positions the reader to feels strongly about the objectivity of women in this society. ‘Rape doesn’t matter’ pg x this is the first three words of the text, at that instant you immediately feel morally out rage and think to your self how could this be? At this point Carrington has got your attention as you are questioning the values of this society. She goes on to say ‘People had forgotten, that Leigh was the victim and not the boys or the people of Stockton’ pg xii, once again you are confused, as how could the boys who brutally raped and murder a fourteen year old girl be the victim? Carrington conveys an image that this people are somewhat immorally corrupt, and strengthens that view by including statistics of
Some topics in this essay:
Robyn Leigh,
Ruth Armstrong,
Leigh Leigh,
Matthew Webster,
Leigh Leigh’s,
Leigh Surfaced,
Matt Webster,
Newcastle Herald,
Mead Stockton,
Stockton Newcastle,
leigh leigh,
killed leigh leigh,
legal system,
killed leigh,
carrington positions,
rhetorical questions,
evidence people,
leigh leigh’s,
emotional language,
feel morally,
includes expert,
Join now to see the rest of the essay!
Approximate Word count = 1440
Approximate Pages = 6 (250 words per page double spaced)
More Essays on Who Killed Leigh Leigh Professional Papers: |
CUSTOMER SERVICES
|
|
Saved Papers
You haven't saved any papers.
|