A number of international efforts have been

In conclusion, president George W. Bush’s decision to not adopt the protocol aided the U.S. economy to compete with other industrialized nations. Adopting the 1997 protocol would have put the U.S. at a disadvantage with China, India, and Brazil because it would have put restrictions on the capability of manufacturing, production, and consumption, which in turn, affect our GDP and our strength in the world community.

Opposition to the treaty in the United States is spurred by the oil industry, the coal industry, and other enterprises that manufacture or depend on fossil fuels. These opponents claim that the economic costs to carry out the Kyoto Protocol could be as much as $378 billion, due mainly to higher energy prices (Lash, 1). One-third of all energy consumed in the U.S. goes into the delivery and production of electricity. In 1997 more than one half

The Kyoto Protocol will not be binding until nations accounting for 55 percent of 1990 greenhouse gas emissions have ratified it. To date, only three small island nations: Fiji, Tuvalu, and Trinidad and Tobago,

of all electricity generated in the U.S. was produced from coal. According to the Kyoto protocol, in the year 2010, the U.S. will have to reduce its emissions by 30 percent. This will cause an 18 to 77 percent decrease in coal usage affecting electricity generation, a

Some topics in this essay:
Kyoto Protocol, According Kyoto, Kyoto Japan, Proponents Kyoto, Japan Canada, Trinidad Tobago, George Bush’s, Due Bush’s, India Brazil, kyoto protocol, European Union, reduce emissions, greenhouse gases, fossil fuels, gas emissions, greenhouse gas emissions, 160 countries, japan negotiate, percent below, kyoto japan, below 1990, “energy information” 1, kyoto japan negotiate, percent below 1990,