Example Essays Home
FAQ
Acceptable Use Policy
Tech Support
LOG IN!
Click HERE for Instant Access
 
This is a free preview of the paper.
Join Now
Log In
  

Interpreting a Composer’s Intentions

In Randall R. Dipert’s short, but thought provoking article, ‘The Composer’s Intentions: An Examination of their Relevance for Performance’ four questions were discussed. What are the composer’s intentions? Do these intentions ever conflict? If so, which intentions are we to follow? And lastly and most difficult “Why ought we to follow the composer’s intentions with regard to performance?” The first part of Dipert’s article suggests that it is impossible to perform all of the composer’s intentions because they conflict with each other. This was argued by dividing the composer’s intentions into three categories, low-, middle-, high-level, and then disqualifying the relation between each other. Dipert’s second part suggests why we do not need to follow the composer’s intentions. In this paper I will attempt to show that a sufficient amount of the composer’s intentions are known, do not contradict, and at times should be followed when performing.

To alleviate any confusion when referring to Dipert’s article I will use his three levels of a composer’s intentions and their definitions which are as follows: Low-level intentions are those concerning the means of production of sound and include t


I agree that it would be very unlikely for the sound of a clarinet to startle a modern audience however I do not agree with what Dipert assumes the intention of the Composer to be, to startle a modern audience. Dipert seems to think that the composers intentions are to affect audiences of all eras. When in practical reality Gluck’s intentions were probably not to startle every audience for the rest of time but were to startle an audience of mid eighteenth century concert goers. Thus when Gluck’s middle-level intentions are satisfied in front of a modern audience his high-level intentions are not dissatisfied.

This just leads us to the reasoning that there is no exact way to replicate the experience of hearing Gluck’s clarinets for the first time. I think that there are two main ways for someone to try to experience Gluck’s clarinets or any other classical piece of music. One, have the performer interpret and perform his idea of how the piece would affect the modern audience similarly to the original audience by translating the composer’s middle-level intentions. Or two, listen to a performance as it would have been most closely performed to an audience of the composer’s time and use individual knowledge of music and history to interpret for oneself what the experience may have been like. I believe this is the value of performing with the composer’s intentions because it gives more opportunities for a better understanding of a work of music.

he type of instrument, fingering, etc. Middle-level intentions are those that effect the intended sound, such as temperament, timbre, attack, pitch, and vibrato. High-level intentions pertain to the effects the composer intends to produce

Some topics in this essay:
Relevance Performance’, Gluck’s” Pg, composer’s intentions, high-level intentions, middle-level intentions, modern audience, Randall Dipert’s, middle- high-level, middle- high-level intentions, startle audience, intentions effect, middle-level intentions effect, agree dipert, composer’s middle-level intentions, composer’s middle-level, low-level intention, probably startle audience, audience high-level intentions,

Join now to see the rest of the essay!
Approximate Word count = 1154
Approximate Pages = 5 (250 words per page double spaced)


  

Join Now
(Credit Card)
Join Now
(Online Check)
Join Now
(Phone 1-900)



CUSTOMER SERVICES




Acceptance Essays
Arts
Custom Essays
English
Foreign
History
Miscellaneous
Movies
Music
Novels
People
Politics
Religion
Science
Sports
Technology
Book Notes

 

 


All papers are for research and references purposes only!
Copyright © 2002-2009 ExampleEssays.com DMCA
Saved Papers