Armed Interventions in Troubled Countries
Many people in different organizations working for the same cause, PEACE feel different about the armed interventions. Problems are very similar even though the conflict and the country might be different. Throughout the years countries have tried to work together through their state departments, but it was not really so sufficient and it was taking to much time to get all the people from all these countries to get together and help each other or another country that is in trouble. After all of the wars that the world had been going through few men at the time had decided that an institution had to be built to get all of the nations at one level so they can communicate through their channels more efficiently. During this time an institution named United Nations was created, in 1945 I believe in the San Francisco Bay Area. This International Organization was responsible to have all of the representing countries inside so they could work better and much faster. Two of the major bodies of the United Nations are Security Council and General Assembly. The Security Council passes military laws and regulations, such as: interventions with force or send peace keeping forces or just act as intermediate between the two groups that are in co
One of the examples that I am most familiar with is the conflict in the Balkans, Kosova, Croatia and Bosnia-Herzegovina. These republics have been part of the country known as Yugoslavia. During the 90’s the president of Serbia, which is another republic of Yugoslavia decided to start a war demanding more land and power for his nationals. After the break up of the republics the wars were being started for ridiculous reasons, but even though there weren’t good reasons people were still being killed. And at this point the international community was saying this is and internal war, or civil war and that they should not interfere since the laws drawn by the law makers at United Nations decided that in countries like these there should not be any intervention. Here is an example of what they had written down in 1962 as far as interventions: “Chapter VIII, Article 53, prohibits enforcement action (as distinguished from action in self-defense) by regional agencies without the authorization of the U.N. Security Council. In 1962 the International Court of Justice said that enforcement action is coercive action in the context of Chapter VII, which deals with threats to the peace, breaches of the peace and acts of aggression. If the NATO action is designed to coerce the Yugoslav government to accept the allied peace plan for Kosovo, it would require Security Council authorization under Article 53. On the other hand, if the NATO action is designed to ensure humanitarian relief for the people of Kosovo or merely to help them to repel armed aggression, one could argue that Security Council authorizatio
Some topics in this essay:
United Nations,
Security Council,
Croatia Bosnia-Herzegovina,
,
Kosovo Albanians,
Chapter VII,
VIII Article,
International Organization,
Court Justice,
security council,
united nations,
international community,
nato action designed,
article 53,
action designed,
nato action,
enforcement action,
keeping forces,
council authorization,
peace keeping forces,
security council authorization,
people killed,
Join now to see the rest of the essay!
Approximate Word count = 1083
Approximate Pages = 4 (250 words per page double spaced)
|
Example Essays Home
