Should Political Parties Be State Funded?
The Home Secretary David Blunkett said that political parties will eventually be financed by the state. He said that democracy depended on the proper accountability of political parties. But why the change, what is wrong with the current system and how with this effect the people of this country?The current way in which a political party gets funding is predominantly by donations, either from wealthy individuals or big business. In the case of Labour, around 8% of its costs are paid for by party members' subscriptions, with affiliation fees from unions contributing only around 27%. Donations make up the remaining two-thirds. For the Conservatives, the ratio is much higher, with around 90% of their funding coming from political donations. Even the Liberal Democrats find donations outnumber subscriptions by about two to one. The disadvantage of this current system is that it leaves the political party in power in a venerable position to sleaze even John Prescott has admitted that allegations of sleaze relating to large business donations are a
Some topics in this essay:
Westminster Major, David Blunkett, Tony Blair, Ecclestone October, John Prescott, Bernie Ecclestone, Liberal Democrats, political parties, business donations government, tony blair, business donations, donations government, current system, political donations, political party, labour party,
Join now to see the rest of the essay!
Approximate Word count = 709
Approximate Pages = 3 (250 words per page double spaced)
More Essays on Should Political Parties Be State Funded? Professional Papers: |
CUSTOMER SERVICES
|
|
 |
All papers are for research and references purposes only!
Copyright © 2002-2009 ExampleEssays.com DMCA HMS
|
|