her husband decided not to tell Mme. Forestier the truth. Instead, the couple ended up spending ten years of their lives paying for the replacement they bought for Mme. Forestier. After the ten years had past Mme. Loisel ran into Mme. Forestier, and told Mme. Forestier what had happened

for her rather than resentful because of her attitude towards herself. On the other hand, if de Maupassant did decide to use Mme. Loisel’s husband; the story would have given the reader the most limited information the reader could get out of the characters. Her husband was an unreliable character in which he was deluded. The only information we do know about him is that he is a clerk, and he is married to Mme. Loisel.

The theme of the story which was greed, and selfishness, and what the antagonist was was herself, and her position in society. This gave the tone and style the description it needed to bring the authors points more vividly to the reader. Greed played a major role in her position in society. Mme. Loisel was probably middle class, but where she wanted to be was in the high class. Not until she lost nearly everything did she appreciate what she had.

She suffered ceaselessly, feeling herself born for all the delicacies and all the luxuries. She suffered from the poverty of her dwelling, from the wretched look of the walls, from the worn-out chairs, from the ugliness of the curtains. All those things, of which another woman of her rank would never even have been conscious, tortured her and made her angry. (60)

Some topics in this essay:
Mme Loisel, Mme Loisel’s, Mme Forestier, mme loisel, Summary Guy, De Maupassant, Necklace” Guy, mme forestier, de maupassant, Mme Forestier’s, necklace mme, mme loisel husband, loisel husband, “the necklace”, ironic twist, original necklace, guy de, necklace mme loisel, necklace cheap imitation, tell mme forestier, tone de, original necklace cheap,