Comparing and Contrasting Jonathan Edwards and Patrick Henry

Jonathan Edwards uses harsh and descriptive language throughout the whole selection such as “how dreadful is the state of those that are daily and hourly in the danger of this great wrath and infinite misery.” There is also a constant repetition of words that pertain to hell and sometimes the word itself is also used. Edwards also uses several metaphors and similes such as “The bow of God’s wrath is bent” and “The wrath of God is like great waters that are damned for the present.” Patrick Henry also uses metaphors in his piece as well as rhetorical questions, repetitions, and allusion

The one thing in which both of these pieces differ completely is the audience it was meant for. Edwards was speaking out to those who were not “reborn,” those “out of Christ,” and those who had not confessed Christ as their only savior. Basically, he was trying to make an impact on the sinners and persuade them to be more holy. Henry, on the other hand, was speaking to the President of the United States and the Virginia Convention. He was speaking to them for political reasons, although he did mention God during the speech. It is quite obvious that the audiences of these speeches we totally and completely different from each other.

s. He uses the phrase “to avert the storm which is now coming” as a metaphor for the war that is about to begin. The constant repetition of countless rhetorical questions and the use of exclamation points is obvious. One can easily tel

Some topics in this essay:
Patrick Henry, Jonathan Edwards, Puritans God, Virginia Convention, , Odyssey Bible, patrick henry, jonathan edwards, rhetorical questions, edwards patrick henry, Edwards Patrick, jonathan edwards patrick, compared contrasted using, metaphors similes, descriptive language, harsh descriptive, extremely persuasive, edwards patrick, contrasted using, harsh descriptive language, virginia convention,