A Formula for Conflict
The United States is the number one country for supplying weapons to other nations around the world. It would be common sense that the countries the United States supplies weapons to would be their allies, nations that would further the values of democracy and countries with an honorable human rights record. However, this first perception would be wrong. The United States supplies weaponry to two different types of nations. The first type of nations the United States supplies weapons to are countries who are relatively democratic allies, nations like South Korea and Japan. The second type of nations that the United States supplies weaponry to are countries who are at war with one another or with countries who have unworthy democratic or human rights statuses, nations such as, Columbia, Saudi Arabia, and Indonesia. The United States military has also had to face troops previously trained by the United States own military, countries such as; Panama, Iraq, Somalia, Haiti, and now in Afghanistan. Why does the United States supply these nations with weapons that in turn cause or increase so much grief? The reason why the United States supplies these weapons is for a profit. The United States should not supply weapons to warring count
Because of September 11th, the Bush Administration announced plans to provide military training and equipment to Colombia as part of the fight against terrorism, in addition to funding already provided to the Colombian government for anti-narcotics efforts. The Bush Administration has delivered millions of dollars in military assistance to the Colombian military despite the Colombian government's failure to meet human rights conditions established by the U.S. Congress. On Tuesday, June 20th, 2002, the U.S. Senate voted by a margin of 89 to 11 to reject an amendment that would have removed $225 million of military aid for Columbia and redirected that money toward drug treatment and prevention programs in the United States. Later another amendment proposing the money going to military aid of Columbia be dropped from $1 billion to $200 million was defeated by a vote of 79 to 19. These votes had shattered the hopes of those who wanted to improve the human rights in Columbia. Why is it necessary to support a country who violates human rights laws with one billion dollars worth of military aid when the money can go towards bettering the nation? The US military aid will go to fund a Columbian military unit to pursue paramilitary leadership in a time when the Columbian army continues to condone and support paramilitary as an integral part of its strategy, and this its self is just going in a circle to help the problem. When the Columbian army supports this paramilitary unit and the US funded military goes after this group it will only cause more conflict within the country. In 1985 poor human rights conditions took the lives of about 60,000 people in Columbia. Today, that number reaches about 20 a day. The situation has reached a new low in February 2002 when the peace
Some topics in this essay:
Congress June,
Greece Turkey,
Afghanistan United,
,
Bush Administration,
Human Rights,
NATO United,
Korea Japan,
Cyprus United,
Indonesia United,
human rights,
military aid,
greece turkey,
united supplies,
supplying weapons,
united supplies weapons,
intensify conflict,
selling weapons,
weapons nations,
supplies weapons,
weapons countries,
countries countries violate,
countries violate human,
warring countries countries,
violate human rights,
Join now to see the rest of the essay!
Approximate Word count = 1204
Approximate Pages = 5 (250 words per page double spaced)
More Essays on A Formula for Conflict Professional Papers: |
CUSTOMER SERVICES
|
|
Saved Papers
You haven't saved any papers.
|