The Zionist Movement and the White Paper of 1939
Zionism and the Palestinian conflict has been the subject of considerable interest since the beginning of the Jewish Question in the modern world. British foreign policy and imperialism in the Middle East has been a defining factor in the Zionist movement. The White Paper of 1939, as others like it, promised eventual independence to the Zionists, but in reality it did little more than enhance the conflict within Palestine. British involvement in the region was purely self-interested and more detrimental than beneficiary to the Jews, regardless of their pledge defend the Zionist cause. This paper attempts to prove the argument by considering the following issues: England’s motive in contrast to its promise, the overall vagueness of the document, lack of a practical strategy for peace, and the disregard for the original desires of the Zionist people. British drive for colonization in the 20th century was the primary motivating factor in their support of Zionism. For centuries the Middle East was controlled by the Ottoman Empire. The latter's disintegration in 19th and 20th centuries coincided with the increase of nationalism and imperialism in Europe and the exploitation of Arab oil. Competition for foreign colonies provoked th
The White Paper of 1939 was designed as a method of placation for the escalating friction between the Arabs and the Jews. Although vague, it favored neither side, but rather sought overall peace for their own benefit. Rather than supporting the Jews as promised, Britain's new policy in relation to Palestine on the eve of the war in Europe was clearly aimed at appeasing the Arabs. Convinced that for the Arabs, Jewish immigration formed the core of the Palestine problem, Britain decided in 1939 to limit drastically the scope of this immigration, and thus proved their apparent lack of true Semite sympathy as the Zionists believed. From 1933 to 1936, more than 130,000 Jews arrived in Palestine. During this period the Yishuv, or Jewish community in Palestine, grew by about 80 per cent, the high point for immigration coming in 1935, when 62,000 persons entered Palestine. The decision of the Conservative Government to retreat from its support for partitioning Palestine into Arab and Jewish states and from its support for Zionism was manifested in the White Paper of May 1939. Among other provisions, this document set an immigration quota of 75,000 Jews for five years, after which further immigration would be conditional upon Arab consent. This is an obvious severance from their original declaration of sympathy and dedication to the Jewish Zionist aspirations. In this action, again British interests precede those promised to the Zionists. Another important aspect in the argument against English sentiment for the Jewish cause is the wording within the document itself. The White Paper, like others before it, is worded is an ambiguous way that prooves advantageous to the British. One of the first points in the paper states the obligation of the parliament “To place the country under such political, a
Some topics in this essay:
White Paper,
Middle East,
Palestine British,
World War,
Jews Arabs,
Ottoman Empire,
Palestine Britain,
Arabs Jews,
Balfour Mankind,
British French,
white paper,
middle east,
british foreign,
white paper 1939,
foreign policy,
world war,
paper 1939,
british foreign policy,
imperialism middle east,
imperialism middle,
zionist movement,
european powers,
british policy,
Join now to see the rest of the essay!
Approximate Word count = 1222
Approximate Pages = 5 (250 words per page double spaced)
More Essays on The Zionist Movement and the White Paper of 1939 Professional Papers: |
CUSTOMER SERVICES
|
|
Saved Papers
You haven't saved any papers.
|