Pope John Paul II left no question about abortion in the Catholic Church. The Pope has often argued vigorously that abortion is murder and condemns laws that permit abortion as being intrinsically unjust, lacking in authentic juridical validity, and not being morally binding. It is like a space within which the morality of abortion has no place. If it is a case of rape or incest, abortion is a moral act, otherwise, it is not a moral act. How can an act be moral sometimes and not other times? The fact is that the entire pro-abortion argument has consistently been based on lies. This is especially when the medical needs of aborting have been used as the basis for aborting a fetus. Supporters consistently use euphemisms such as terminating a pregnancy which is dishonest. They also say that the fetus is only a 'potential' human being as if this fetus might be born as something other than a human being. They argue that the decision concerning abortion should be between the woman and her doctor but they fail to point out that in the greater majority of cases, the woman has never met the doctor who will perform the abortion until the time of the procedure. Even in the very beginning of the legal controversy, the supporters of Roe v Wade argued were misled; they believed legal abortion would result in fewer unwanted children born, there would be fewer children living in poverty, and there w

Some topics in this essay:
Roe Wade, , Church Pope, Paul II, abortion moral, act moral, moral act, act moral fetus, unwanted children born, children living poverty, issue abortion, legal abortion, unwanted children, children living, moral circumstance, mother's womb, living poverty,