Censorship: Protection vs Freedom
On September 6th, 2001, fourteen year-old Corey H died. He killed himself with a butcher knife in his home in Turket, PA. His death hardly affected the small town of Boiling Turket. The only talks of Corey H were murmurs of high school students, gossiping about the circumstances behind his death. As journalists shaken by the death of one of our peers, my high school newspaper staff wanted to write about Corey’s death and follow up with an article about teen suicide. The administration decided that we could not, under any circumstances, write anything about him in the paper. We were furious, because all that we intended to do was to write about our feelings of loss and pain, about how sad it was that he was gone after having taken his own life. We wanted to expose the issue of teenage suicide in what we felt was a safe, public manner. From the school’s perspective, we were advocating it by putting it in the written word. This argument about censorship between students and administrations had been going on for ages. For high school journalists, censorship has long been inevitable. For decades, high school administrations across the country have been attempting to control what students
On the other hand, high school journalists have rights, too. Just because there are students at their schools whose parents don’t think very highly of individual opinions does not mean that the journalists should suffer. Censorship, by definition, is suppressing anything objectionable, meaning subject matter considered to be inappropriate. Schools tend to redefine this as subject matter considered to be inappropriate for school aged people and subject matter distracting to the learning environment. School administrators use their power to decide what may or may not be viewed both in literature (books, magazines, etc.) and school-created news media, such as school newspapers and yearbooks. Larry J. Sabato, director of the Center for Governmental Studies at the University of Virginia, once wrote that critics see journalists as "hypocritical of others yet vengeful when criticized ... wrapping themselves in the First Amendment when challenged on virtually anything." Journalists offer a slightly different opinion. They believe that they “had to listen to the people they were criticizing. If people want to reply to my work, more power to them. Just don’t stop me from saying the things I want to say.” (Megan Bruce, High School Journalist). It’s a difficult battle, because no one on either side is trying to do any harm; they both believe they have everyone’s best interes
Some topics in this essay:
Boiling Turket,
Advisory Board,
School District,
Schools Cope,
Journalist It’s,
University Virginia,
Association NRA,
FREEDOM September,
Turket PA,
school journalists,
Larry Sabato,
subject matter,
school newspapers yearbooks,
matter considered,
newspapers yearbooks,
censorship people,
read write,
considered inappropriate,
protect youth,
school newspapers,
subject matter considered,
matter considered inappropriate,
Join now to see the rest of the essay!
Approximate Word count = 935
Approximate Pages = 4 (250 words per page double spaced)
More Essays on Censorship: Protection vs Freedom Professional Papers: |
CUSTOMER SERVICES
|
|
Saved Papers
You haven't saved any papers.
|