Terminally ill patients are deemed terminally ill for one reason; all odds are against their chance of sur

die anyway, why prolong his or her suffering. This article provides a very clear and accurate point to demonstrate the lack of necessity in prolonging a patient’s life when they are so close to death.

vival and recovery. The body’s ability to sustain life itself fails, and is overridden by a machine of medication. Therefore, as soon as they are removed from this machine or medicine, they will die. In addition, the methods at which these tools are administered are not always the most pleasant to experience. This is depicted in the article when the author writes that a nurse had to drill holes in Charlotte’s bones in order to inset medicinal lines. These last ditch attempts at sustaining life can scar and disfigure the body permanently in addition to the immense pain. This brings up the question of why should this suffering be administered at all? If the patient is going to

The decision to sustain the life of a dying patient is not always made correctly by the parents or directly family. Whenever the family is faced with the difficult decision of trying to save their lo

Some topics in this essay:
Ms Mitchell, Advisory Board, , Tan Death”, Christine Mitchell, terminally ill, Worse Death”, ill patients, terminally ill patients, “when living fate, Fate Worse, Living Fate, article “when living, opinion writer, fate worse, “when living, article “when, living fate worse, patient’s life, living fate, chance survival, christine mitchell,