Face Perception
Face perception allows us to recognise one another and is an important social communication facilitator ingrained in our evolutionary past. Face perception has long been an interesting field of study with research focusing on whether face perception is mediated by domain specific mechanisms. Variuos evidence from neuropsychology, neurophysilogy, cognitive development and functional brain imaging suggetst that feac perception may be mediated by a spoecilaised system in the human brain. In evaluating such evidence that face perception is localized to discrete anatomical locations within the brain it must be made clear that face perception involves multiple specific cognitive functions. Indeed face perception involves not only recognition of identity but moreover higher cognitive functions such as recognition of emotion and mood. It is unreasonable too assume that csuch varied cognitive function would be localised to discrete regions. The perception f ofaces elicits neural activity in multiple regions and is therefore more of a distributed neural system. However the cognitively distinct asopect of the recognition of identity seems to be mediated by distinct neural representations.Neuropsyhological studies involving patients with
experiments on monkeys in parallel with human subjects would enable a more direct comparison (Kanwisher intro) Haxby et al have proposed on the basis of a iwde range brain imaging and other data such as that found in the neurpsholocical literature, a model of the human neural system that mediates face perpcetion. The model has a branching structure that emphasises a distinction between the representaion of invariant apsects of faces, which underlie the recognition of identity, and therepresentation of variant aspects that uneerlie perceprion of information pertinent for socal communication. The model has a heirachical structure that distingiushes a core system for the visual analysis of afaces and an extended syte that processes the meaning of nfomation obtained from faces. The core system cocnsists of three bilateral regions witham anatomical configuration in which the inferiroe occipital region may provide input to the lateral fusiform and superior temporal sulcal regions. prosopagnosia (McNeil and Warrington, 1993; ), a selective impairment of the ability to recognize familiar faces despite a largely preserved ability to recognize objects, provides strong evidence that distinct neural systems mediate face perception. The compelling study of patient WJ showed that prospagnosia cannot b seen as a more general impairment for within category-category discriminations. The mCneil and Warrington study of Wj a ptient who exhibited profound proaopagnoisa was however able to recofnise another group of visually and easil confussble stimuli, the faces of sheep. Double dissociations have also been found, patient CK (REF) exhibited impaired reading and object rcognition despoite normal face recognition, indicating that the neural systems involved in face recognition and object recognition are dissociated. The lesions associated with prospagnosia are found in the ventral occipitotemporal cortex and are usually bilateral(ref dam sergent) however there is evidence of cases of prosopagnosia associated with damage confined to the right hemisphere (Derenzi and Derenzi et al.)
Some topics in this essay:
Neuro Haxby,
Elizabeth Haxby,
HAX Fmri,
Results FFA,
,
Moscovitch Moscovitch,
Kanwisher Kanwisher,
McNeil Warrington,
CK REF,
Johnson Infnats,
fusiform gyrus,
neural system,
eye gaze,
et al,
neural systems,
recognition identity,
brain imaging,
haxby et al,
responsive regions,
stronger response,
object recognition,
functional brain imaging,
perception involves recognition,
neural systems involved,
involves recognition identity,
Join now to see the rest of the essay!
Approximate Word count = 2217
Approximate Pages = 9 (250 words per page double spaced)
More Essays on Face Perception Professional Papers: |
CUSTOMER SERVICES
|
|
Saved Papers
You haven't saved any papers.
|