Many people will argue that the liberal ideals of a presidential government are better than the responsible principles of a parliamentary government. These people will argue that checks and balances limit the power of a government. An example of these checks and balances is seen in the United States Senate. In Senates legislative role it is given the power to amend legislation passed by the House of Representatives. It can also smother legislation in the commit

Another strong argument that is commonly used to support a parliamentary government is that it does believe in checks and balances just not to the same degree as a presidential government. A parliamentary government has what is known as a vote of non-confidence. This is seen when the executive becomes irresponsible and loses the support of the House of Commons. When this occurs the House can have a vote of non-confidence and subsequently remove both cabinet and the Prime Minister from power. When this occurs since the executive branch has been vacated, any political party may try to earn the support of the House of Commons, and take over as the official government. In the event that no party is successful an election would be called and the people would once again vote to determine the nation’s government. The vote of non-confidence is a very effective check that still allows the government to accomplish its objectives without having every single decision checked over and over again. This allows a parliamentary government to accomplish much more than a presidential government.

Perhaps the strongest argument from someone who supports a parliamentary government is that a majority government is able to pretty well accomplish any goal that its party has. When a political party holds a majority government there is very little that the opposition can do to prevent them from achieving any of their political goals. A majority government is given such extreme power because of party discipline. This party discipline allows the Prime Minister to have guaranteed support of the cabinet for any of his proposals. Also the House of Commons will almost always pass these proposals into law. Since there is the vote of non-confidence the majority government does still need to be careful with its

Some topics in this essay:
House Representatives, House Commons, Prime Minister, Canada United, Representatives President, Senate Senates, parliamentary government, , house representatives, presidential government, checks balances, house commons, majority government, party discipline, parliamentary system, responsible principles, vote non-confidence, government people argue, principles parliamentary government, passed house representatives, parliamentary system checks, ideals presidential government,