Internet Taxation
“Internet Non-Discrimination Act” was passed in 2000 in order to extend five years on “Internet Tax Freedom Act” (ITFA) which was due to expire in 2001. ITFA provides a three-year tax moratorium which has triggered a great deal of discussions and debates to the new business model of e-commerce and new types of transactions on the Internet. The e-commerce taxation controversy is apparently not merely between consumers and businesses, but more of an issue among stakes of consumers, online and offline businesses, and governments. The major problem here is whether Internet taxation should be executed, if yes how to execute it, and how much the tax rate should be set to.One victim that suffers most directly from the lack of Internet taxes is the state and local government. The proposed ITFA would prevent states and localities from levying taxes on many communications and transactions conducted over the Internet for a minimum of three years. This "moratorium" on taxation of Internet and electronic commerce could have far-reaching effects on state and local revenues that “a new report by the General Accounting Office (GAO) claimed that state and local g
As e-commerce can be viewed as an opportunity to modify new tax systems to address today’s business model, it is important to offer a solution which treats all parties involved fairly. I would like to combine the first and the second proposal with a slight revision. State needs to mandate a uniformity of less than 5 percent flat rate on all sales products all over country, not just different states. This rate seems most reasonable to all parties involved. If there’s no tax collected online, government will loss revenues as well as online companies. If the tax rate is higher than 5 percent, consumers cannot afford the purchase; in addition, many online companies will lose revenues. A flat rate of tax is essential to avoid confusing consumers, to benefit offline business and somehow protect online business, and to sustain government profits; as a result the whole nation’s economy can keep prospering. The third and the last solution is proposed by the 29-member Organization For Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) that “any taxation scheme should levy taxes on goods based on where they were consumed rather than where they were produced” (page 4). Due to many conflicts among three parties: governments, consumers, and businesses, different parties have proposed different solutions over the Internet Taxation issue. To add to the complexity in taxing the Internet, we have to point out that a sound system has not been developed yet to collect Internet taxes even if the ITFA does not exist. “Given the high costs associated with collecting and remitting use taxes under the current system, many executives argued that the costs of implementing the taxes would lead to the death of many online firms” (page 2). Overall the major confli
Some topics in this essay:
Appropriations Act,
Development OECD,
Act” ITFA,
Internet Taxationâ€2000,
Electronic Commerce”,
Byron Borgan,
Office GAO,
Solutions Due,
Ernest Hollings,
Non-Discrimination Act”,
tax rate,
internet taxationâ€2000,
page 2,
credit card,
internet taxes,
local governments,
solution proposed,
flat rate,
online companies,
online companies tax,
business model,
taxationâ€2000 page 2,
flat tax rate,
sales tax revenue,
internet taxationâ€2000 page,
Join now to see the rest of the essay!
Approximate Word count = 1188
Approximate Pages = 5 (250 words per page double spaced)
More Essays on Internet Taxation Professional Papers: |
CUSTOMER SERVICES
|
|
Saved Papers
You haven't saved any papers.
|