Historically Scape-Goated
How can two such differing images of the same man possibly coexist? Eventually, historical documents could be flipped topsy-over for a major influential purpose. A great example of historical revisionism is one of William Shakespeare’s play of King Richard III performed in 1595. This tragic play revolves around the historical wars in England between the rival houses of Lancaster and York. After a long civil war, towards the beginning of the play, the York’s have won and England is enjoying a period of peace under King Edward IV. But his younger brother, Richard, Duke of Gloucester, a malicious, power-hungry, and bitter of the disfigurement he was born with wanted the throne for himself. In order to do it, Richard kills anyone he has to. Once he was crowned King, a descendant of the Lancaster family, Henry Tudor, Earl of Richmond, challenged for the throne and won. Sadly, Richard III was scape-goated by historical revisionism from being a good ruler to being a villain just to save the good publicity of Queen Elizabeth’s side. The controversy surrounding Richard III still exists five hundred years after the end of his reign. The Richard of the just ruler, a good husband, and a brave soldier is lost in politics. “The deform
“As king, Richard brings many beneficial changes to England” (Spinak). Historically proven, he was a king who really cared for the education of his country. Richard III prohibited taxing the importation of books and commanded that laws be written in English so everyone could understand. He initiated a relay postal system. Gave money to poor students, and started the bailing system. As for any king would indeed, Richard trampled over personal tragedy. But overall, he was not an evil ruler. The fictional images of Richard being a villain was actually both the combined efforts of Sir Thomas More’ s History of Richard III and of Shakespeare’s Tragedy of King Richard III. The portrayal of his characteristics was heighthen and rewritten so that Henry Tudor would become the savor of England from disorder since his reign was weak. “Uncertain way of gain! But I am in so far in blood that sin will pluck on sin” (Richard, 4.2.64-65). Thanks mainly to Shakespeare, Richards is known in the popular imagination of being a wicked protagonist. In Richard III, the wicked protagonist conspires against kin, plots political takeovers, woos widows, and sets assassins against children. All these acts were all false statement towards Richard III where history was often used and studied to teach moral lessons. But to make a stronger moral statement, bits of fiction were often sprinkled into the descriptions of actual events. In this case, a lot of fictional details were invented from stories written by Richards’s enemies. Eventually, the true villain would have been Henry Tudor, Earl of Richmond who wanted to strengt
Some topics in this essay:
Richard III,
Overall Plantagenet,
Contradicting Richard,
Henry Tudor,
III Modern,
Henry VI,
Tower Richard,
Elizabeth York,
Queen Elizabeth,
,
richard iii,
henry tudor,
king richard,
shakespeare’s play,
king richard iii,
lancaster family,
wicked protagonist,
history richard,
women humor,
people richard,
real richard,
tudor earl richmond,
henry tudor earl,
Join now to see the rest of the essay!
Approximate Word count = 1092
Approximate Pages = 4 (250 words per page double spaced)
More Essays on Historically Scape-Goated Professional Papers: |
Join Now
(Credit Card)
|
Join Now
(Online Check)
|
Join Now
(Phone 1-900)
|
CUSTOMER SERVICES
| |
|