Example Essays Home
FAQ
Acceptable Use Policy
Tech Support
LOG IN!
Click HERE for Instant Access
 
This is a free preview of the paper.
Join Now
Log In
  

Chisolm's Criteria

Chisholm’s Criterion to me is probably one of the most significant and hardest problems of philosophy. The questions under his criterion are general and important to understand.

Chisholm starts his explanation on trying to answer if what we know is really correct. On top of this question though he finds that if we know things there must be a way or steps to prove that we know them. He uses examples of appearances to understand this, but it only leads back and forth with no answer. As well the use of actual objects is used so that our senses are telling us what is happening, which make things more believable to us. Again though the conclusion goes in circles because how do we know about these objects. So in the end Chisholm came up with these questions “ What do we know? What are the criteria of knowledge?”(text 161).

These questions are paired together where as the answer to one may help you lead to the other. So if we know for example what is a lie and what is the truth than we might be able to explain to someone how to tell the difference. Though if you don’t know the extent of your knowledge then it will be quite difficult to answer what the criteria is of knowledge. On the other spectrum


The Methodist such as John Locke in his terms came up with a solution to the problem. He felt that if beliefs are to be believable they must relate to the persons sensations. This is also what is known as “empiricism”. This style of thinking will start with a criterion and use it to answer the question of what we know. The problem that Chisholm finds with this type of thinking is that it begins with too broad a generalization even though empiricists tend to look at detail. Another thing to look at is why has he chosen this way of thinking and not another one. The second objection to this way of thinking is itself. The problem is that through being an empiricist the only things that are known are through sensations.

The Particularist way of thinking is much different. G.E. Moore was a particularist and very simply would state, “ I know this is a hand and so do you”(text 163). Chisholm believed that this way of thinking was the correct was and that the Methodists were wrong. In basic terms Chisholm believes that we do not need to know that we know. There are many things that we know to be true. For example if what is perceived by the senses is told to you at this moment most likely what

Some topics in this essay:
Chisholm’s Criterion, GE Moore, John Locke, Criterion Chisholm, answer question, can’t answer, answer answer, answer question answer, people answer question, answer answer reached, answer reached can’t, reached can’t answer, reached can’t, answer reached, question figure, figure answer, question answer, truth able, people answer,

Join now to see the rest of the essay!
Approximate Word count = 809
Approximate Pages = 3 (250 words per page double spaced)


  

More Essays on Chisolm Criteria


Professional Papers:
Dow Corning Breast Implants4528 words
Downs Syndrome3709 words



Join Now
(Credit Card)
Join Now
(Online Check)
Join Now
(Phone 1-900)



CUSTOMER SERVICES




Acceptance Essays
Arts
Custom Essays
English
Foreign
History
Miscellaneous
Movies
Music
Novels
People
Politics
Religion
Science
Sports
Technology
Book Notes

 

 


All papers are for research and references purposes only!
Copyright © 2002-2009 ExampleEssays.com DMCA
Saved Papers