Killers or Life Savers, Nurses or Rangers?

Because of my respect for the creators of human life and my need to protect them, I advise all women not to seek full equality with males and certainly not to pursue an equal contribution to the Army because the army is an institution whose main characteristics are violence and death. Women from all around the world, if you want to protect your country and your children, don’t join the army, be nurses instead, and

The army is an institution whose aim is to protect the population of the country it belongs to, against any threat, foreign or domestic, this goal is pursued by the most violent means known by man witch are called wars. But again, how can organization such as the army be able to protect the population that it is supposed to protect if it intends to achieve that by putting in danger of death the vast majority of it in case of a war? How can the Army be a protector if it puts in danger the future of the country? If one thinks about it, the most dramatic casualties of war are usually women and children, and that, because they reflect the future of the country, women by being the creators of children and children by being the future active members of the society. Therefore, by allowing women to attend it, the army fails to protect what it is intended to, the future of its country.

Women create life, they don’t take it away. Women are creatures that live to be caring and loving with others. Women are meant to be good mothers, symbols of family and life. Even in chess that is one of the oldest games on the planet, the queen is the most powerful pawn and is always placed next to the king for protection, if one looses his queen he will most

Some topics in this essay:
CEO’s Politicians, , human life, future country, equal aspects, future country women, protect human life, protect human, women world, king game, country women, army institution, life don’t, protect population,