The Good, the Bad, and the University
Theodore Roosevelt may not have been adequately thorough when stating that educating “a man in mind and not in morality is to educate a menace to society” (quotesonmorality). Assuming that he is referring to education at the university level, this could imply that if a university does not provide a moral education, the product may result in an immoral individual using acquired knowledge in a way that harms society. If this were true, universities would be producing “menaces to society” left and right because, according to John Mearsheimer, most major schools “are silent on the issue of morality” (Mearsheimer). The issue then raised is whether or not universities should in fact teach morality. Due to the fact that student bodies are culturally diverse, the only morals that would be appropriate to teach, and thus encourage, are those which are universally acceptable. These basic morals, such as honesty, are already evident in university policies; no cheating, respect fellow students and professors, respect school property, etc. Most students entering universities already have their own general concepts of what is right and wrong and would find it ridiculous to be sitting through Morality 101. Since universal moral
There once was a time in which chivalry and culturally specific morals ruled societies, but needless to say, that time is no more. Morals are still an integral part of society, but due to the cultural diversity of the U.S., it is inappropriate to conclude that there is one set of deeply rooted culturally based morals that we as citizens shall all believe and abide by. Assuming so would be to ignore a large portion of the freedoms that our country so proudly embraces. Instead, we must consider the ethical values that men and women of every culture can agree with. These universal morals are still readily present in society from school policy, to federal law. The more complex moral mysteries must be left up to individual discovery along the journey of life. Universities are thus not obligated to provide answers to what is right and wrong, but instead to expand one’s scope of knowledge. This education helps one develop into an Universities already require students to adhere to basic morals, and because of this universities should not over-emphasize them by further instruction. They are already evident in policies such as the code of conduct, and in university housing policies. Plagiarizing, cheating, respect, substance abuse, loud music passed a certain hour, and destroying school property are all acts condemned by universities and are based on basic morals that set ground rules for the pursuit of knowledge. An individual cannot acquire knowledge by cheating on an exam, or plagiarizing in an essay, thus proving the need for these simple virtues. Since the code of conduct already covers universal morals, and students across the globe are aware that dishonesty in their work is unacceptable, there is no need for further moral instruction in the university. individual with thinking skills necessary to not only formulate strong beliefs and
Some topics in this essay:
Stephen Carter,
John Mearsheimer,
Church Considering,
Theodore Roosevelt,
critical thinking,
thinking skills,
universal morals,
basic morals,
critical thinking skills,
teach morality,
moral beliefs,
contrary popular,
discerning wrong,
wrong instead,
concepts wrong,
contrary popular opinion,
Join now to see the rest of the essay!
Approximate Word count = 1271
Approximate Pages = 5 (250 words per page double spaced)
More Essays on The Good, the Bad, and the University
Professional Papers: |
CUSTOMER SERVICES
|
|
Saved Papers
You haven't saved any papers.
|
Example Essays Home
