Web Credibility
Summary: As in all things, judging whether a website is credible or not requires good judgment, and a manner in which to determine that credibility. One of the best ways to begin such a process is by checking to see if the author states who they are and offers a way to be contacted. This is useful because if you do not believe the article is true, you can research their name to determine if the person is a reputable expert in their field. Also, assess the entirety of the site to look for discrepancies. If there is one error, there are most likely more. Determine if the information is accurate and logical. If the presented data is whimsical and illogical, it is most likely not true. There is, however, a chance that they are still right, no matter how insane the suggestion, so it is a good idea to examine their source information very closely if the theory seems unreasonable. The fourth step is to compare the site’s appearance to its subject. If the graphics are whimsical on a serious subject, you should question the information presented. Most authors wouldn’t make light of their subject if they wished to be taken seriously. Next, one must check the site to see if the author gives his research data and lists his sources. This
Relevance: The relevance to the subject was, indeed, clear and concise, but there is a vast difference between relevance, and usefulness. The article didn’t go off on tangents, talking about how flowers are pretty or how twinkees feel funny, so I suppose that can be considered relevant, but as far as how useful it really is, its practical application is so low that it can not be measured in real numbers. Reaction: To be quite honest, I was unimpressed by what the article suggested. Most of the tips were just common sense, and the others, such as checking the data against other sources, were not concrete methods. Such suggestions as that are pointless on their own. If one looks hard enough, they will always find someone who has differing data. It matters little if the site that refutes the first’s information is more reputable. Time and again in history, great men, such as Aristotle, were believed because of their reputation while those with the correct assumptions, such as Democritus, are left out in the cold because they are unknown. This piece was utter tripe. If someone is not intelligent enough to know these steps already, they shouldn’t be left alone in a room with sharp objects much less be entrusted with validating information. I personally think that a
Some topics in this essay:
college essay,
customized essay,
write thesis fast,
free thesis statements,
thesis statements,
thesis statement,
research paper assignment,
customized essays,
college essay,
customized essay,
write thesis fast,
free thesis statements,
thesis statements,
thesis statement,
research paper assignment,
customized essays,
college essay,
customized essay,
write thesis fast,
free thesis statements,
thesis statements,
thesis statement,
research paper assignment,
customized essays,
college essay,
customized essay,
write thesis fast,
free thesis statements,
thesis statements,
thesis statement,
research paper assignment,
customized essays,
Join now to see the rest of the essay!
Approximate Word count = 860
Approximate Pages = 3 (250 words per page double spaced)
More Essays on Web Credibility Professional Papers: |
CUSTOMER SERVICES
|
|
Saved Papers
You haven't saved any papers.
|