Response to Anti-terrorism bill
As a response to the terrorist acts of September 11, 2001 in New York City, efforts have been made to devise new forms of security that will prevent atrocious acts of that caliber from re-occurring. The anti-terrorism bill, signed on Friday November 16, 2001 by president Bush was designed to alleviate the possibility of new attacks by terrorist. The anti-terrorism bill calls for extreme measures that may infringe on the civil liberties of citizens. The question now arises as to whether the need for a bill that carries the extremity of the anti-terrorism bill is necessary or does it go too far?Following the September 11, occurrences Attorney General Jim Ryan proposed the anti-terrorism bill. Under this bill law enforcement official will be able to wiretap all telephones used by suspect terrorist as well as allow FBI agents to obtain billing records from hotels, phone companies and seize money or property from suspects (O’Connor, John; Associated Press State & Local Wire). The need for court orders to perform the aforementioned will no longer be necessary. Under Jim Ryan’s legislation the definition of terrorism is also narrowed down in order to prevent civil activist groups from being deprived of their first amendment
The anti-terrorism bill was passed unanimously through the house, with a 355-66 vote, and the senate, with a 98-1 vote, at a rapid pace (www.chiadaily.com). According to president Bush the bill is “an essential step in defeating terrorism” (www.latimes.com). In order to prevent the over exercise of power by law enforcement agents, an expiration date was placed on wiretapping and surveillance power. The expiration year is set for 2005. The anti-terrorism bill was carefully written to protect the citizens and yet preserve their civil liberties. The anti-terrorism bill has an expiration date, thus making it a temporary state and leaving room for open review in five years. The notion of “drastic means calls for drastic measures” can be applied to this situation. The safety of the United States was called into question and the U.S. government has As a representative democratic nation the anti-terrorism bill cannot be enacted without it being passed through the house and the senate. In the House of Representatives, each member represents their district and generally votes according to the public approval of a bill, within their respective district. This allows for citizens to have a voice in public policy. If the citizens in each district felt their rights were being violated with the anti-terrorism bill they have the ability to lobby their representatives to vote against such measure. In essence no bill c
Some topics in this essay:
Louis Post-Dispatch,
American Government,
John Locke,
House Representatives,
York City,
Jim Ryan,
Jim Ryan’s,
anti-terrorism bill,
,
law enforcement,
Local Wire,
enforcement agents,
law enforcement agents,
civil liberties,
expiration date,
fourth amendment constitution,
bill passed,
social contract,
called question,
allows citizens,
bill calls,
anti-terrorism bill calls,
Join now to see the rest of the essay!
Approximate Word count = 963
Approximate Pages = 4 (250 words per page double spaced)
More Essays on Response to Anti-terrorism bill Professional Papers: |
CUSTOMER SERVICES
|
|
Saved Papers
You haven't saved any papers.
|