A man once said "I do not think that it is wise, at this stage of understanding, to attempt to propose a precise definition of consciousness, but we can rely, to good measure, on our subjective impressions and intuitive common sense as to what the term means.The same seems to hold for art You know what it is, I know it, but a definition is something else. so lets look at some basic concepts that people might have for "visual art" to be considered high art or low art. we have four catagories concept, asthedics, and excuition. i believe that if u have these three elements you have a great chance of chreating a piece of art work but if its only one or maybe to the chances are that if will be low vs a high piece of art.
first lets go over this concept thing. in modern art today conce
excution is the catagory that i prolly hold to be the lowest form by itself. when execution is missing the other two ellements the type of art work that you most offten get is the bob ross happy tree type of art. the artist reduces art to a simple process that is repeated over and over. when you see this art you look at it and say ya thats nice time to move on and look at art that stay at home moms dont creat. not to put down stay at home moms by any stretch of hte imagination.
pt it seems is every thing. asthedics and excuition are often time compleatly forgotten, and thats ok for alot of people to jsut have concept and deep though , but no thats not enough for me i need something thats at least a little asthedicly pleaseing and excuted well. now dont get me wrong if it dosent have