To What Extent was There opposition towards the Nazi Party?
The following report investigates opposition towards the Nazi party, focussing particularly on the 1943 White Rose movement. Prior to popular belief, at the height of Nazi popularity, Hitler only won 37 percent of votes at the elections (i.e. less than half of the German public’s votes) . From this finding, I have concluded that there surely would have been opposition to Hitler’s swift claim of power, though relatively little information is known about this. Hence, I have chosen this topic with the aim of exploring and collecting information on reasons for resistance towards the Nazi Party, on details of a group of resistance (the White Rose) and briefly, on reasons why they did not succeed. In order to write a thorough report, it is crucial to investigate several primary and secondary resources so as to gauge an impartial assessment of the situation at the time.For the purpose of this report, I have consulted various secondary resources and have found that they are, on most part, consistent with each other in recording details of the White Rose movement. All sources describe the views of opposing sides, that is, the Nazi party and members of the White Rose. Whilst Muchener Neuete Nachricten o
This investigation could be improved by referring to more primary sources. Admittedly on the course of my research, I have found a lack in primary resources, which directly refer to the White Rose movement. However, this may be because Hitler tightly controlled the propaganda at the time, and hence, disallowed the opposition’s opinion to be publicized. One such party who dared to voice their opinions were a group of students from the University of Munich (the city that was later known as the home of Nazism), who banded together in 1942-1943 to form the ‘White Rose.’ Having chosen the name “White Rose” as a symbol of purity and innocence, it comprised of the core members Hans Scholl, his sister, Sophie Scholl (both from a Catholic upbringing), Christoph Probst, Willi Graf, Alexander Schmorell and the philosophy professor, Kurt Huber. Hans Scholl (having been previously a leader in the Hitler Youth) was amongst several others who had served in the army before and had been direct eyewitnesses of brutal atrocities, which perhaps was the reason for their involvement in “White Rose”. Their adopted strategy was based on passive resistance, that is, a non-violent method of social change that employed strategies such as the wide-spread distribution of leaflets, the painting of anti-Nazi slogans and inscriptions on the walls such as “The Spirit lives” and “Down with Hitler.” Put into the words of Inge Scholl, a
Some topics in this essay:
White Rose,
Findings Conclusions,
Hitler Whilst,
Hitler Youth,
Sophie Scholl,
National Socialism”,
University Munich,
Nazi Party,
white rose,
Range Opinions,
,
nazi party,
white rose movement,
rose movement,
sophie scholl,
secondary resources,
course research,
range opinions,
national socialism”,
kurt huber,
hans scholl,
towards nazi party,
Join now to see the rest of the essay!
Approximate Word count = 970
Approximate Pages = 4 (250 words per page double spaced)
More Essays on To What Extent was There opposition towards the Nazi Party? Professional Papers: |
CUSTOMER SERVICES
|
|
Saved Papers
You haven't saved any papers.
|