Parents play a vital role in the censoring of television violence from their children by monitoring what they watch on a regular basis; however parents often confront television producers for introducing harmful materials to their kids. The men and women who run the television industry have been receiving a great deal of pressure these past few years about what is considered acceptable on television. Far too many parents have been pointing the proverbial finger of blame without realizing they have three more pointing back at them.
Although television producers have somewhat of an obligation to air suitable content on television, children are the sole responsibility of their parents. Suzanne Braun Levine in “Caution: Children Watching” states “I’m less proud of the fact that I don’t exert very strong controls over what they watch; and there have even been times when I have caught an image of a h
Even though television violence may change a child’s view of the world, parents are obligated to impose upon their children the difference between reality and fantasy. Not surprisingly, when kids commit acts of violence based on what they have seen on television, their parents become very concerned. James S. Nairne, in “Learning From Others: Observational Learning” from the book Psychology: The Adaptive Mind asserts “Even if people don’t directly imitate or model a particular violent act, it’s still likely that the observation itself influences the way they think.” Nairne implies that witnessing violence distorts one’s perception of violence or death. Nairne also claims that a distorted perception of death can lead to an imprudent fear of everyday conditions. Since it is possible that violence in television can cause children to have an altered sense of reality, it is even more vital that parents play an active part in re