United States v. Microsoft
Microsoft has been around since 1975, nearly thirty years. Since that time they have encountered many problems along the way. From being accused of stealing Xerox’s interface to create Windows, to Apple accusing the same years later, to being accused of trying to put Netscape under by incorporating Internet Explorer into the Windows operating system. The later was one key incident leading to this antitrust case against Microsoft. One of the first programs Microsoft created was DOS, which they sold to IBM but with the agreement that both companies could sell the product. After that Microsoft created the first version of Windows which ran in conjunction with DOS to operate home PCs. Windows quickly grew in popularity and eventually captured market dominance in the IBM-based PC market because most PC users wanted Windows with their PC. With that, Microsoft had the ability to offer bulk discounts to OEMs [Original Equipment Manufacturers, or PC makers] but with certain conditions. These conditions included that PCs must be shipped with Windows only and with no other competitive operating systems and they must include Internet Explorer. Microsoft was using their dominance with Windows to create that same success with Internet Explore
I’m a computer geek, I admit. The way I see it is that Microsoft was at the right place at the right time. Unfortunately, they screwed up by trying to push ahead without thinking about what laws they should have been working around. It was pretty obvious that they had broken antitrust laws, and I’m surprised no one tried to find a solution before they were taken to court. After Windows came out, no home PC could be without it. It was so popular, that every software or hardware product was designed around it. There have been many other operating systems, but you can’t displace something so widespread. It’s like trying to replace VHS with Beta after VHS had been the main format for 5 years. It’s near impossible. So Microsoft tried to use that to their advantage and take other popular software products, such as Netscape’s internet browser, and displace it with their own product, and then bundle that product with Windows so that every single person with a PC was forced to have exposure to it. It makes perfect sense money wise, but someone should have been smart enough to realize that it was breaking some sort of law. Unfortunately, no one was and they had to fight it in court. Microsoft got off lucky in the first decision back in 2000. If they had to split into two companies, that would have been hard to recover from. They squeezed past that problem. Then when they had finalized a settlement, they got off pretty easy too. They didn’t have to divulge any actual source code or information about Windows, which would have been devastating for another company to create a Windows-clone. All they had to do is give out code and information for other companies to create software that would let their software use every important code and action in Windows so that it could run seamlessly, rather than trying to write their own code and try to make it work the best they could. Microsoft had to let OEMs and PC users remove Windows software if they wanted to.
Some topics in this essay:
Internet Explorer,
Beta VHS,
Justice Department,
Judge Kollar-Kotelly,
Microsoft Unfortunately,
Explorer Windows,
Antitrust Act,
Judge Jackson,
Manufacturers PC,
,
internet explorer,
operating systems,
competing software,
companies sell,
code information,
justice department,
deals oems,
microsoft created,
home pc,
popular software,
Join now to see the rest of the essay!
Approximate Word count = 1327
Approximate Pages = 5 (250 words per page double spaced)
More Essays on United States v. Microsoft Professional Papers: |
CUSTOMER SERVICES
|
|
Saved Papers
You haven't saved any papers.
|