Women’s and girls’ bodies determine democracy
Sociologists Candace West and Don Zimmerman argued that gender was less a component of identity –fixed, static- that we take with us into our interactions, but rather the product of those interactions. In our societies, there is the dimension of masculinity versus femininity. Historically, differences between men and women have usually been ascribed to biology; that is, men’s bodies appear with penis, no breasts, no hip, no body hair, and short hair. Women’s bodies, oppositely, appear with vulva, breasts, hip, no body hair, and long hair. But when feminists use the term gender, there are not generally referring to biological differences between men and women, but to set of culturally defined sex characteristics associated with masculinity and femininity. Masculinity, first, stands for societies in which men are supposed to be assertive, tough, and focused on material success; women are supposed to be more modest, tender, and concerned with quality of life. The opposite pole, femininity stands for societies in which both men and women are supposed to be modest, tender, and concerned with quality of life. The western understanding of gender is based on set of culturally determined binary distinctions, such as public versus p
Therefore, in terms of Eisenstein’s argument that women’s girl bodies determine democracy; free from violence and sexual abuse, free from malnutrition and environmental degradation, free to plan their own families, free to not have families, free to choose their sexual lives and preferences, I agree with this view; that is, “democracy” [from this perspective] would examine a freedom, liberty, or independence of women and girls in order to gain access; such as, to have reproductive freedom, a secure , qualitative life and their own chosen life, the same social position comparing to men, high-level of salary, and so on. Besides, I would like to represent this view through the concepts of feminist theories and together with whether women and girls really have a freedom to choose everything on their own. Feminist theories claim that women are oppressed in a multiplicity of ways that depend on culture, class, and race as well as on gender. Moreover, they are latter investigating the reasons for women’s invisibility that exists not only at the level of policy discourse but also in field of IPE as well as much of feminist analysis of economic globalization have examined hierarchical structures of class, race, and gender. It could be said that an important goal for many feminists is an attempt to speak out for the marginalized and oppressed position of women. dualism between women and men justifies the attribution of different social status on the basis of gender. The separation between public and private normalizes the male preponderance in the public sphere of politic, the higher value placed on male workforce participation, and the controls placed on women’s bodies by the male dominated state. Women are positioned in the private sphere as secondary and associated with a natural or biological predisposition to domesticity, altruism, and dependence. In addition, the most important example which we could clearly understand about women suppression is in the field of glo
Some topics in this essay:
Political ICCPR,
Soviet Union,
Don Zimmerman,
War West,
World War,
masculinity femininity,
civil political,
class race gender,
feminist theories,
liberal democracy,
class race,
race gender,
reproductive freedom,
West East,
modest tender concerned,
liberty freedom,
tender concerned quality,
tender concerned,
concerned quality,
women gain liberty,
gain liberty freedom,
Join now to see the rest of the essay!
Approximate Word count = 1344
Approximate Pages = 5 (250 words per page double spaced)
|
Example Essays Home
