There are several points in Pete Hamill’s essay Crack and the Box to argue with. His idea is that watching television is like heroine or other addictive drugs. He thinks we become passive and asocial because of it. Of course, television can be a problem for some people but for the majority, the time we spend watching television is just a chance to sit back, relax, and not think. After all, we’ve been busy all day. The whole argument that television is like an addictive drug is far fetched.
In the Nielson survey of American viewers the average American family watched seven hours of television a day. This sounds shocking, until you realize that there are approximately 4.5 people per family. If you divide the seven hours of television viewing per person, then the hours a day watched per person comes out to roughly 1.55 hours. That’s not so shocking, is it? Also, obviously technology has advanced in the past several hundred years. We have electric stoves and lights. We drive cars instead of horse carriages.
Television can be a problem for some, just like alcohol or gambling, or even caffeine or sugar. It’s not a big enough problem to argue about, though. I’ve yet to hear of the Television Addicts Anonymous group. Perhaps they are out there hiding. As long as we go out occasionally and mingle with real human beings, then I see no problem. Sitting on the couch a few hours a week is a luxury. If you’re a busy person then you can relate. Being able to put your feet up is nice. Moral of the story: play with your kids so they don’t choose the television set over you, oh, and be social. We don’t want a bunch of television heads.
Television does not “absorb it’s viewers the way drugs absorb it’s users.” Most people I know can get up after a show is over and move on to something else. Drug addicts have to have a fix every few days or even hours. I don’t know too many people who watch television every few hours. A lot of the people I know only watch it a few days a week.
Hamil also argues that television makes us passive