British Empire
One of the greatest empires that ever existed is that of the British Empire. With colonies all over the world including Africa, India, and even the holy land, all fell under British rule or occupation. British History can include the history of all those colonies that were ruled by and or influenced by the British. Before expanding the scope too far it’s important to look at British History where it first began and in its own geographical origin. It was only in 1707 in the Parliamentary Union where the creation of Britain came about. So does that mean that British History is only the events that happened after 1707? How do historians approach this? Which countries are included in “British History” and how is that justified? These are just some of the questions that historians have to address. J. G. Pocock tries to address some of these issues in his article “ British History: A Plea for a New Subject.” with much of his emphasis on the terminology that is used in describing ‘British’ History. Taking a more recent look at the status of ‘British’ History, Raphael Samuel, tries to assess the history of England, Ireland, Scotland, and Wales in his article “British Dimensions: Four Nations History.” His interp
retation (Four-Nations) of ‘British History’ is really an expression of retreat of “empire” which is really “post-colonial” discourse. Pocock identifies several reasons for his “plea for a new subject.” He begins by identifying that there is a lack of records and because of this it is difficult to sort out problem of nationality. He states that English history, Scottish history, and Irish history all happened before written documents were developed. He believes that it is not until there is Anglo-Norman power in Ireland that the history of the three kingdoms, which include England and Scotland, has in a sense begun. All of the culture conflicts, the language barriers, the phenomena of marches, and the distinction between lowland and highland zones, all combined to make ‘British’ history. The political context to Pocock’s approach begins with increasing dominance of England as a political and cultural entity. In this process Scotland was taken captive by English politics and played the role of the dogs tail. According to Robert Ballie and Johnston of Wariston, while the Scottish were very articulate people, they went against House of Commons and other English writing and arched to England’s superior power. While the English were making and writing their history, the Scottish couldn’t make their own history to write about. It also seems that because Ireland and Scotland had lost their records (Cromwell carried off early Scottish records, ship sunk in 1660 and Ireland’s records were lost in an explosion in 1922 in Four Courts) they had no choice but to be included in “British History.” Pocock uses ‘British history’ for lack of a better term. It is u
Some topics in this essay:
Scotland Ireland,
British History,
Nations History”,
England Scotland,
Scotland Wales,
History Samuel,
Diaspora Pocock,
Ireland Scotland,
Commons English,
Anglo Celtic,
british history,
‘british history’,
‘british’ history,
ireland scotland,
‘four nations’,
article “british dimensions,
highland zones,
samuel’s article,
british diaspora,
pocock’s approach,
included “british,
dimensions nations history”,
ireland scotland wales,
scotland wales article,
included “british history”,
Join now to see the rest of the essay!
Approximate Word count = 1143
Approximate Pages = 5 (250 words per page double spaced)
More Essays on British Empire Professional Papers: |
CUSTOMER SERVICES
|
|
Saved Papers
You haven't saved any papers.
|