In his article “Democrats Should be asked about Social Security” Michael Tanner explains how the democrat party is unequipped to handle the problem of social security. Tanner claims that all ten of the democratic candidates running for president have yet to come up with plans to save Social Security. He states “No one should be running for president i

Edwin Feulner in “Protecting the Future” echoes the writings of Tanner and Smith. He feels that getting people to agree there is a problem is the first step to saving Social Security (Feulner). Then everyone must come to an agreement on a solution. According to Feulner, one way to save Social Security is a new bill called KidSave. KidSave allows each individual to have their on retirement plan with no chance of the government taking it away. Feulner believes KidSave is the must fair and simple solution to a growing threat in America. Like Smith’s idea it may fail but again at least he’s trying.

Not only do all three authors believe Social Security is a problem. But, they also believe that if nothing is done, America is setting itself up for failure. The authors all agree that the government must pass different bills to save Soci

Some topics in this essay:
Social Security, Edwin Feulner, According Tanner, Michael Tanner, social security, Tanner Smith, KidSave KidSave, White House, Security” Tanner, Smith Forgetting, America Smith’s, save social, save social security, bills save social, believe social security, running president, authors believe, edwin feulner, security feulner, bill called, people agree, social security bill, michael tanner, bills save, social security fixed,