Why Students Shouldn't Cheat
I got a student using one of these papers by using google. Don't use this essay. You'll get caught. Many philosophers have argued, and rightly so, that acts such as those that betray, destroy one’s reputation, or undermine one’s achievements can harm a person even if they never affect her experiences. For instance, it seems that the slandering of my reputation can be harmful to me even if I never become aware of it, even if I never experience any change in how others act around me, even if I never feel any less respected as a result of the defamation. The reason is that I care not only about feeling respected, but also about being respected. Now some philosophers go a step further and argue that since I desire to be respected not only while alive but also after my death, the slandering of my reputation can be harmful to me even if it occurs after my death. For if it isn’t necessary that I learn of the slander or experience any ill effects as result of it, then why do I need to be alive at the time the slander occurs in order for it to constitute a harm for me? All that my death does is make it all the more certain that I will never be experientially affected by the slander. But if this is not a necessary condition f
(b) Aim: The aim of my project is to make sense of the idea that the dead and the demented can be harmed by the non-fulfillment of their past desires. I will argue, in contrast to other philosophers, that you can harm yourself by causing your past desires to go unfulfilled. For instance, in the above example where I fail to finish the book, I harm myself. For if I fail to finish, then it becomes true that all the sacrifices I had made during those ten years of working on the book were made in vain. Working on the book involved certain opportunity costs, e.g., it meant that I had less time to spend doing others things that I might have enjoyed doing more. Now whether those opportunity costs were worth incurring depends on whether or not I ultimately succeed in writing the book. For if I don’t succeed, then the sacrifices were for nothing—and thus not worth incurring. But now if I can be made worse off by failing to succeed in this case, then it seems that I can be harmed by events that occur after my death. For posthumous events can determine whether or not I succeed in achieving certain things for which I made sacrifices. Consider, for instance, the case where I go to great lengths during my life to ensure that my family will be left financially secure should I die. But now suppose that, upon my death, the money I had intended to leave for my family is stolen by an unscrupulous attorney. Clearly, I am harmed by this theft. By stealing the money, the attorney makes it true that all the sacrifices I had made in order to amass this n
Some topics in this essay:
,
past desires,
past desire,
non-fulfillment past,
harmed non-fulfillment,
non-fulfillment past desire,
dead harmed,
harmed non-fulfillment desires,
harmed non-fulfillment past,
slandering reputation harmful,
dead harmed non-fulfillment,
finishing book,
worth incurring,
question bears,
desire don’t,
reputation harmful,
Join now to see the rest of the essay!
Approximate Word count = 1048
Approximate Pages = 4 (250 words per page double spaced)
|