England vs france 17th century aristocracy
The seventeenth century was a period of war and instability in Europe. In France, the dawning of a new century was marked by the Edict of Nantes, which granted the right to practice Protestantism in various parts of France to Huguenots. This caused great discontent of French Catholics. Subsequently, the English Queen Elizabeth’s favorable rule set unreasonable standards for future monarchs. The insecurity caused by this led to dramatic changes in government, and the fluctuation between power and privilege of aristocrats in both countries. The seventeenth century saw the decline of the French aristocracy’s power and the retention of its privilege, whilst the English aristocracy, specifically the House of Commons in parliament, maintained its economic dominance and privileges. The completion of Versailles contained and restrained the French aristocrats, denying them of their previous political power while permitting them a courtly life. Life in England would be dominated by two sequential wars: the English Revolution and the Glorious Revolution, each a case of de ja vu. England’s aristocrats showed a great arrogance during the seventeenth century due to the massive financial power they held. During the Elizabethan era (secon
During the seventeenth century the French aristocracy lost its power and political influence while it retained the courtly life; the English aristocracy gained tremendous power while it maintained its privileges. By reducing the aristocrats to meager servants, Louis XIV strengthened the dominance of the French monarchy. England was subjected to monarch after monarch who simply could not effectively handle Parliament, and the revolutions that resulted put the aristocrats of England in a position of great power. The beginning of the 18th century marked the start of the Enlightenment as the French aristocracy turned to science and philosophy to fill the void in their lives. The Enlightenment, which began towards Louis’s death, produced such great French philosophers as Voltaire, Rousseau, Diderot, and Baron d’Holbach. d half of the sixteenth century), England’s aristocrats willingly sacrificed some power to the Queen, whose skillful politics, such as asking for tolerance because she was a woman, gave her the empathy and lukewarm support of Parliament and the House of Commons (McK, 550). The standards set by Elizabeth’s interaction with parliament contrasted strongly with James I’s less-than-civil policy, once stating when told the people wanted to see him, “God's wounds, I will pull down my breeches and they shall also see
Some topics in this essay:
Versailles Louis,
Glorious Revolution,
Louis XIV,
Blue Collar,
Queen Elizabeth’s,
House Commons,
James I’s,
Enlightenment French,
William Orange,
Parliament England,
seventeenth century,
english aristocracy,
house commons,
glorious revolution,
french aristocracy,
century french aristocracy,
collar laws,
england’s aristocrats,
parliament recognized,
political influence,
century french,
blue collar laws,
seventeenth century french,
french aristocracy lost,
power aristocrats held,
Join now to see the rest of the essay!
Approximate Word count = 905
Approximate Pages = 4 (250 words per page double spaced)
CUSTOMER SERVICES
| |
|