Sartre vs Deleuze and Guattari

According to Sartre, when immanence is not immanent to something but itself, then it is only possible to speak of a plane of immanence. The plane then can perhaps be radical emparisism.therefore the plane presents events that are expressed in the form of words as concepts. But what does this mean, radical empiricism? “When immanence is no longer immanent to something other than itself it is possible to speak of a plane of immanence.Such a plane is, perhaps, a radical empiricism”pg 47

Sartre makes in his work is that there is a difference between subjectivity and consciousness and that the former cannot be reduced to the latter. Sartre places consciousness outside, in the world basically there is nothing in consciousness. More importantly

Some topics in this essay:
According Sartre, According D&G, Deleuze Guattari, plane immanence, immanence immanent speak, according d&g plane, plane immanence plane, immanent speak plane, plane radical, according d&g, radical empiricism, immanence immanent, immanent speak, d&g plane, speak plane, immanence plane,