Shakespeare’s infamous play Macbeth is full of many diverse characters and situations, with Macbeth himself being without a doubt the head honcho of diversity. Macbeth goes from a commanding warrior to a besieger of the throne through the course of five short but perilous acts. “Till he unseamed him from the nave to the chops, and fixed his head upon out battlements.” The preceding quote best shows how Macbeth was a valiant and talented warrior, but in due time is ready to unleash his hellish desires and become the tyrannical ruler of the prophecies bestowed upon him. Everyone dabbles in dark thoughts and wishes, but there is a fatal difference between thinking and doing.
Every good plot needs an antagonist, someone that everyone just loves to hate, but can still relate wit
What would they play be like without Macbeth himself? Why there would be no play at all. King Duncan would continue his rule of Scotland, everyone could keep their sanity in tact, and there definitely wouldn’t be any of the merciless death that everyone came to dread so. The only way that a negative could have possibly come out of Macbeth’s absence, is in the fact that he won King Duncan that battle that opened the play. When Scotland was under attack, Macbeth was there to defend and defeat for his king, keeping the country safe for the time being. Without him there might not have been a Scotland for him to steal at all.
h in the long run. Macbeth fills that role with the up most perfection. The reader gets to watch a magical transition from a noble thane, into the heinous k