Drffernce between direct and representative democracy
Like many political terms the word Democracy is derived from the Greeks words ‘demos and kratos’i. e. The rule by the people. “Democracy is a form of government offering a workable solution to the fundamental political problems of reaching a collective decisions by peaceful means.”R.hague et al. 2001.It is the concept of collective decision and the mechanics of participation that is our concern, The forms of democracies in question that is, direct and representative are both in their own distinguish ways democratic and carry the connotation of rule of the people and by the people, but the bone of contention is the process by which these distinguish democratic ideas are put into practise. The most important aspect of both these forms is the participatory nature, whereas one of them entails the active participation of the populace in the discussion and decision making process, the other is concern with the delegation of these duties to an elected group of people to do the discussion and decision making process for the populace. Considering the fact that the basis of modern democracy is the proposition that every adult person’s judgement about the conduct of public affairs is entitled to be given equal weight with every oth
The idea that representative democracy resolves a dilemma on “How to combine popular preference with expert judgement” A. Heywood 2001.Leaves an ambiguity as to weather questions like what did the populace want? The decision of these “expert” representative are ambiguous in the sense that one is not sure if a majority vote in these assemblies really do represent the wishes of the entire populace as in most cases they vote in party lines, they are basically putting the party interest before that of their constituents. We have also seen the rise of lobby groups and the big effect it is having on representative democracy, these lobbies are now so powerful that they can now influence government and assemblies on behalf of special of special interest and this is making representative democracy increasingly inadequate, more or less it seems as if an interloper has inserted it self in the democratic process. This will be different in the case of a direct democracy as in it case when the populace decides and it is there for all to see and democracy will be in practice instead of it been stuck in a half-way house as in the case of representative democracy in which the final word is delegated to the chosen few who might not make the “expert” decision expected of it. er person’s. It is only fair to say despite our differences financially, intellectually, or otherwise, men and women should have equal right to say how we wish to be governed. So for citizens to be only able to exercise their political right by electing representative every four to five years who between these intervals takes all the decisions which might not be in the public interest is not fair and it is not what an old Athenian would call democracy. My point of argument is that direct form of democracy can be more democratic than the representative form in so doing will focus on the REPRESENTATION and DECISION MAKING process.
Some topics in this essay:
Representation Plato,
Election Study,
,
Similarly Denmark,
decision process,
direct democracy,
representative democracy,
REPRESENTATION DECISION,
election representative,
active participation,
hard practical,
people equipped,
discussion decision process,
level education,
workable solution,
public spending,
Join now to see the rest of the essay!
Approximate Word count = 1556
Approximate Pages = 6 (250 words per page double spaced)
|
Example Essays Home
