1. The best senior leadership groups rarely perform as a true team due to the natural construct of a hierarchy.

2. Most senior leaderships can optimize their performance as a team by trying to obtain a balance between team and non-team efforts. This is true even though overall executives prefer to function as individual leaders with full accountability.

3. To obtain a better balance it is necessary to integrate the skills required for team performance with the discipline of single-leader behavior.

Overall, he exemplifies when working with a team effort is preferable and when executive leadership is the better choice. He also depicts how working as a team does not necessarily sacrifice each member’s individual capabilities. Teams at the Top addresses the importance of

Much of the books' knowledge comes from the integration of Katzenbach pre-existing expertise in organizations, leadership, and team performance with that of his team of experts past in-depth analysis and research on organizations and teamwork. In Teams at the Top his experts used scientific methods of research (as they had done in the past) and displayed the results to the reader (note: there were no conclusions drawn, but mere observations of the research were conveyed to the readers).

“As usual, his writing yields a nice balance of engaging description and conceptual prescription.”-- Richard E. Cavanagh, President and CEO, The Conference Board

Some topics in this essay:
Teams Top, Book Distinctiveness, John Katzenbach, Target Audience, Wisdom Teams, External Validity, Teambuildingincom Conclusion, Reviews Book, Internal Validity, Gamble McKinsey, teams top, wisdom teams, senior level, multiple levels, team performance, team experts, single leader, senior level positions, previous wisdom, validity 8, top addresses, previous wisdom teams, teams top addresses, teams multiple levels, arctic survival experiment,