Evaluating the War in Iraq
Imagine that you are watching a daytime soap opera in the comfort of your home. One of the leading ladies is murdered, but nobody in the small town of Middlebury knows who murdered the woman. Just as in the suspenseful drama of a soap opera episode, the American public wants to know who or what is responsible for what occurs in international relations. Similar to detectives on a TV show, political experts gather evidence and attempt to understand why an event occurs. In examining the conflict in Iraq, political experts attempt to identify “causal” factors. The underlying task is to examine why the United States went to war in Iraq. The causes for the conflict in Iraq will be analyzed through three levels of analysis: system-level analysis, state-level analysis, and individual-level analysis. First, the causes of the conflict in Iraq will be analyzed by system-level analysis. The system-level study of international politics states that factors external to nations and the international political environment determine how nations and transnational actors on the world stage interact. To determine the causes of the war in Iraq, the polarity of the global political stage will be examined. As the number of poles in a sy
stem increases, the system becomes quite complex. With the world in multi-polar system, the probability of war is higher than a world in a uni-polar system. The United States decision to enter war in Iraq, while dismissed by many nations, displayed the role of the United States as a powerful pole in a multi-polar world. Many European nations, along with Russia and China, opposed the war in Iraq to resist the growing hegemonic power of the United States. While the United States invaded Iraq without the approval of the United Nations, the Bush administration must exercise its power carefully to avoid having former allies of the United States team with the enemies of the United States to create a state of an anti-hegemony. While the system-level analysis if a valid approach in determining the causes of the conflict in Iraq, the system-level analysis is used with state-level analysis and individual-level analysis to understand the causes of the current conflict in Iraq. One serious issue with President Bush’s foreign policy is that President Bush was elected on a platform that would conduct a “humble” foreign policy. The current Bush administration displays its intention to establish power by making war on failed states. When President Bush urged the United Nations to approve his resolution on disarming Iraq, President Bush stated clearly that not doing so would make the United Nations “irrelevant.” Here, President Bush is showing that the relevance of the United Nations Security Council is in the organization’s ability to conform to the demands of the United States. One clear theme of the Bush administration is that President Bush is content to reclaim the international leadership of the United States through its use of force. The system of cooperation among nations has had its time, and now President Bush is displaying his option to seek an unilateral approach to international politics. In closing, from the current conflict in Iraq to President Bush’s foreign policy, time will tell if the current administration wil
Some topics in this essay:
President Bush,
,
President Bush’s,
Nations Bush,
Saddam Hussein,
United States’,
United Nations,
conflict iraq,
president bush,
Iraq Groupthink,
Security Council,
Russia China,
president bush’s,
bush administration,
saddam hussein,
causes conflict iraq,
united nations,
causes conflict,
current conflict,
state-level analysis,
war iraq,
current conflict iraq,
conflict iraq analyzed,
analysis individual-level analysis,
united president bush,
Join now to see the rest of the essay!
Approximate Word count = 1387
Approximate Pages = 6 (250 words per page double spaced)
More Essays on Evaluating the War in Iraq Professional Papers: |
CUSTOMER SERVICES
|
|
Saved Papers
You haven't saved any papers.
|