Class, Language, Morality
The relationship amongst social class, language skills, and morality are often underestimated. In a recent survey, the results proved there were no relationship amongst social class, language skills, and morality, but in all actuality there is. Social class defines a person¡¯s income, location, occupation, education, friends, and peers. Language skills define a person¡¯s speaking skills, arguing skills, and knowledge. Morality defines a person¡¯s sense or view of what is right or wrong. The question is asked, ¡°Is there a relationship between social class and language skills and is there a relationship between social class and morality?¡± In G. Bernard Shaw¡¯s play ¡°Pygmalion,¡± the play proves a character¡¯s social class can be determined by his or her use of language and a person¡¯s morality who belongs to a higher class is not necessarily better than a person of lower status. Many characters in the play prove this fact. Eliza shows how a person¡¯s social status can be judged by one¡¯s command over language and Higgins proves a person belonging to a higher social class is not necessarily more moral than a person of lower status. In the play ¡°Pygmalion,¡± the
In the play ¡°Pygmalion,¡± the relationship amongst social class and language skills; and social class and morality is clearly recognizable. People will always judge a person¡¯s social class based on how he or she speaks, and people sometimes believe a person belonging to a higher social class should be more moral than someone of lower status. The main idea I portray is these relationships are common stereotypes that exist in the world today. People will judge and be mislead by what is on the outside and not what is in the inside. concepts are clear that language skills have an effect on a person¡¯s social class and morality is not judged by the one¡¯s stature in social class, but this play proves how these concepts are common stereotypes. Eliza may prove the relationship between social class and language skills, but Higgins proves the relationship between social class and morality. Higgins is a character belonging to a high social class and has acquired phenomenal speaking skills. Not only can Higgins speak well, but he can determine one¡¯s origin based on dialect. During Eliza¡¯s transformation, Higgins shows how cold hearted he was. The whole time Higgins had no remorse or care of Eliza¡¯s feelings, but only cared about his little experiment and treated Eliza as if she were a doll. The only reason why Higgins was transforming Eliza to a classy duchess was for his amusement and not for good intentions. The play shows how the relationship between social class and morality are often misleading. Higgins¡¯ character portrays an immoral person; even though he is suppose to be seen as a classy and sophisticated man. People often judge a person to be moral if he or she is a person belonging to a higher social class. Most people will believe if one is rich and well educated, he or she would know the difference between right or wrong when compared to a person who is poor and not educated. The play ¡°Pygmalion¡± proves the relationship between social class and morality are often misleading. In the play Eliza represen
Some topics in this essay:
Higgins Eliza,
Bernard Shaw¡¯s,
Eliza Morality,
Class Morality,
social class,
language skills,
relationship social class,
relationship social,
class morality,
social class morality,
social class language,
class language,
person¡¯s social,
class language skills,
belonging social class,
person belonging,
belonging social,
class based,
people judge,
Join now to see the rest of the essay!
Approximate Word count = 1392
Approximate Pages = 6 (250 words per page double spaced)
More Essays on Class, Language, Morality
Professional Papers: |
CUSTOMER SERVICES
|
|
Saved Papers
You haven't saved any papers.
|
Example Essays Home
