In exploring the origins of the First World War, many diverse theories have been argued to whom is primarily responsible for the commencement of World War I. Lenin indicted imperialism as the principal cause of the war. Woodrow Wilson saw the culprit in secret diplomacy. Wilhelm II blamed an anti-German conspiracy led by the English. Sir Edward Grey, the British foreign secretary quoted in his memoirs that the primary factor leading to war was the arms race. In the drafting of the Versailles treaty, the triumphant Allies bluntly asserted Germany’s responsibility. Norman Rich wondered why Germany, if it aims had indeed been so single-minded, did not start the war earlier and under more favorable odds
Bismarck, the man who led Germany throughout the 1800’s and prepared a powerful nation for the turn of the century, est
This deteriorating situation leads readers to believe that the parties involved were not concerned with the ramifications of global war. Instead of weighing out their actions, the always present element of pride blinds the harsh reality of what might be our planet’s first war of many nations. This same pride stands in the way of a chance to resolve the economic instabilities that have sprouted in Europe and cure any instabilities that Germany might have had in regards to its neighbors.
ablished economic stability and allowed the industrial sector to grow and prosper through the industrial revolution. . This Napoleanic leader unified surrounding states into a country with stable roots and a firm hold on the public sector. The stage was set for Germany to expand and rise in the ranking of a European superpower.