lose their political equality. The hard money policy was conceived from Jackson’s bank war and was as the alternative to the conservative system of economic theory and to exclude the banks control of the currency. The hard money policies are credited, by Schlesinger, for significantly revamping American politics “economically: by preventing periodic depressions; politically: by preventing the rise of a tyrannical powers that would rival the governments authority; and socially: by preventing the rule of aristocracy that would exploit the working class.” Schlesinger, himself a liberal democrat, does give a very convincing argument that the Jacksonian liberals played a part in the quick economic recovery from the Great Depression. And I agree, using the provided evidence. It is very plausible that a select group of men that, with so much control over America’s economy could easily overtake America’s government.

Many historians have many different views on the Jacksonian democrats; Schlesinger believed the Jacksonians provided a political movement that has allowed the United States to triumph during a time of economic and social crisis. While other historians, such as Hammond and Pessen, view the Jacksonian government as capitalists who only disguise themselves as compassionate reformers for their own selfish desires. All three passages effectively convey a particular and different statement, I can agree with Hammond and Pessen. Politicians often rally the support of the country in order to accomplish clandestine motiva

Some topics in this essay:
Bank United, National Party, Politics Pessen, Roosevelt’s Deal, Pessen Politicians, Hammond Pessen, Edward Pessen, Schlesinger Schlesinger, Jackson Regretfully, Age Jackson, american politics, hard money, hammond pessen, hard money policy, view jacksonian, founding fathers, schlesinger believed, class conflict, liberal bias, bank united, money policy, own selfish desires,