Descartes
Descartes set out to find and isolate in his mind those things which he could doubt even to the tiniest degree. The purpose of this would seem to be to discover truths which cannot be doubted in any way. He wishes to gain true knowledge and his method of doubt will apparently clear his mind of any slight doubts and leave him only with knowledge which is indubitable and clearly true. He seems to want to bring a new rigour to his thinking. Another possible purpose of the method of doubt is to help his later arguments about God and the distinction between the body and the soul. His method of doubt leads him to rely only on his mind, at least for the duration of the Meditations, and in this sense shows how the mind and body are distinct. He also points out that, if you start from falsehoods, you cannot proceed to truths and so, if the basis of your thought is not correct everything you think will be wrong. In this sense Descartes is a foundationalist as he seeks to question even his most basic opinions and start again from the beginning. One of the main things that Descartes doubts is the senses, although he does not say that we should now forever ignore the senses, but rather just suspend judgement on them. He wishes to challenge
Therefore, the method of doubt uses scepticism as a tool to gain pure knowledge which is indubitable. There are many reasons for this, for example to gain a better understanding of the world and ourselves, to bring a new rigour to our thought processes and to arrive at a place where it is not possible to doubt any of our newly discovered knowledge. The task which Descartes sets is very difficult to achieve as, to get to a point of doubting everything we experience physically and even things which we think are certain, such as mathematics, mean we must doubt all we have to go on. Descartes himself says at the end of the First Meditation that he finds it very hard to doubt all of these things and that he is brought back to ‘normal life’ (Cottingham, 1986, p. 14) by his laziness. This suggests that not even he believes in the paradox which he set out when he said that sense perception cannot give us any knowledge of the world we live in. In the end there is one thing which we can be certain of: however much we are deceived, we must be here, i.e. exist, to experience the illusion, so we can at least be sure that we exist. The extent to which Descartes is a foundationalist shows one of the main reasons for the method of doubt. As already mentioned, he thinks that even the most basic parts of his thought processes are things which can be called into doubt even in very small ways. Therefore, if even these basic principles can be doubted the more complex parts of his thought which rest on them are at risk of being false. Therefore, he gives the example of a building, saying that if its foundations are destroyed, the building will all collapse on top of it, to demonstrate that, in doubting his most basic thoughts, he can also doubt the beliefs which rest on them (see Cottingham, 1986, p. 12). After having claimed that the senses can deceive us at any time, Descartes moves on to more certain truths. He says that things such as physics, astronomy and medicine can be doubted as they are based on physical objects. Things such as arithmetic and geometry however, seem indubitable as, whether we are awake or asleep, a square has four sid
Some topics in this essay:
,
Meditation God,
Descartes Meditations,
Descartes Meditation,
God Meditation,
Surely God,
method doubt,
malicious demon,
cottingham 1986,
cottingham 1986 14,
idea malicious demon,
doubt beliefs,
knowledge indubitable,
mind body,
idea malicious,
1986 14,
deceived leads,
world forms,
Join now to see the rest of the essay!
Approximate Word count = 1447
Approximate Pages = 6 (250 words per page double spaced)
More Essays on Descartes Professional Papers: |
CUSTOMER SERVICES
|
|
Saved Papers
You haven't saved any papers.
|