The world is destined to addiction. People will always be addicted to something if it is available. During these times, something needs to be done about this problem of drug abuse. The most logical strategy is to control supply. It is a very simple tactic in which states: if there is no drugs available to the people, then it cannot be abused. Until President Richard Nixon began to apply the Harrison Act in 1972, “little had been done to combat drugs at home. Ten years later, President Ronald Reagan declared war on drugs and

The amount of money spent on the fight to stop illegal drugs is extremely excessive while compared to the actual affect it has. Applying it to the age-old principle of supply and demand, it proves that the war on drugs is nearly impossible to win. “The trouble, as Courtwright's analysis clearly shows, is that we cannot effectively control supply. And, no, this isn't because we have been soft on drug crime. Our prisons are filled with people found guilty of possessing a few grams of cocaine or an ounce of marijuana. Nor is it likely that escalating punishment further will help: The Chinese shoot heroin traffickers in the back of the head, then send the family a bill for the bullet, but the heroin trade goes on. Executing drug peddlers merely creates job openings for others eager to risk life and limb for a share of the profits.”(peele.net 04). While considering that it doesn’t seem like these efforts should be taken for any expense, and after approaching the preceding information and how little this war attains - consider spending, “annually $40 billion dollars” on it (McWilliams 137).

Every year we spend about 40 billion dollars on attempting to hinder drug consumption. Our plan of attack is logical and our funding distribution is correct, but it doesn’t l

Some topics in this essay:
Ronald Reagan, War Drugs, United Nations, Harrison Act, war drugs, Richard Nixon, hard drugs, entire world, control supply, drug consumption, drug abuse,