What the Lawyers have to look at are the more abstract characteristics that juror#8 has that makes him seem to go on the favor of the boy than just the overly trivial theory that someone similar to your client would be a good juror in the case.

Jurors # 8 profession could have been a hard one to read for the lawyers though, on the prosecutions side they could make the mistake by relying on the stereotype that because juror #8 is an Architect and is at a higher station of life than the common man being selected that he would be less likely to be sympathetic to a boy of Hispanic ethnicity from the slums, not following one of the key rules in the voire dire process the relatively few stereotypes will hold up to be true.

Once the lawyer has examined all of the aspects and issues that will arise at

Some topics in this essay:
Juror Profile, Voire Dire, juror #8, voire dire, family history, voire dire process, dire process, sympathetic boy, variables considered, critical thinking,