Pay to Play
For many years the great tradition of college sports has graced our great country. Over those 100 plus years, college athletes had to maintain high academic honors just to play sports. Seemingly, the times have changed. Now, academics have become second to athletics and most athletes never graduate from college. Recently, college athletes are even pushing for a bill to pass that would grant them money just to play college sports. Would this not take away from our time-honored traditions? Do college athletes not receive enough extra-funding already? While it is an accomplishment to earn an athletic scholarship, they should not be worth more money than an academic scholarship. Auburn University paid over $100,000 in scholarship money to softball star Holly Currie, and it only paid $60,000 to academic scholar Scott Moore who made a 30 on his ACT and had a 4.0 GPA. Athletic scholarship recipients not only receive free schooling, a place to stay, and are also offered on campus jobs. Usually, these jobs have minimum labor and very good pay. So why would these students need to be paid for playing their sports? Most college students who have a part-time job usually work to pay living expenses. Athletic s
cholars already have their expenses paid for. In closing, there is just no way could we afford to pay athletes or even do it fair. College sports have survived over 100 years by losing young stars early to professional sports. By paying college sports not only do we take away from the tradition to the game but we also take away the amateurism of the sports. College basketball and football are still some of the highest rated TV in America and it doesn’t look to have any downward spirals ahead. By paying a college athlete, we are taking the emphases off academics and placing them on athletics. We should be doing the exact opposite. 99.9 percent of college athletes never play pro sports (Bianchi, 2001, p.2). So, why should we stress college sports so heavily, when only 99.9 percent make a profession out of them? Not only that, the national graduation rate for college scholarship athletes is 50% (Stewart, 2001, p.2). I see no point in pumping more money to the athletics, if it’s already wasting 50% of the money on scholarships never finished. Some people suggest taking money from endorsements that the colleges receive from TV networks or big-time businesses such as Nike or Reebok. CBS spent over $6 billion dollars to secure the NCAA men’s college basketball tournament (Bagnato, 2001, p.1). By the time you divide that up betwe
Some topics in this essay:
GPA Athletic,
Reebok CBS,
Stephan Mauyberry,
Pay Play,
University Illinois,
Michael Vick,
Auburn University,
NCAA Bianchi,
TV America,
Holly Currie,
college sports,
college athletes,
2001 p1,
athletes play,
bianchi 2001,
paying college,
college athletes play,
paying athletes,
sports college,
play sports,
2001 p2,
bianchi 2001 p1,
bagnato 2001 p1,
Join now to see the rest of the essay!
Approximate Word count = 913
Approximate Pages = 4 (250 words per page double spaced)
More Essays on Pay to Play Professional Papers: |
CUSTOMER SERVICES
|
|
Saved Papers
You haven't saved any papers.
|