Example Essays Home
FAQ
Acceptable Use Policy
Tech Support
LOG IN!
Click HERE for Instant Access
 
This is a free preview of the paper.
Join Now
Log In
  

Kant on moral duties to animals

What moral duties do we have to animals? Kant’s response is "... so far as animals are concerned, we have no direct duties. ... Our duties towards animals are merely indirect duties towards humanity." (notes) Kant view is that animals instruments for us to use. Therefore we have no direct moral duties to animals. Our duties towards animals are “merely indirect duties towards humanity.” (notes) This means we have an indirect duty to treat animals in such a way that it is morally good for humanity. Some people may think that Kant is advocating animal cruelty or minimizing its impact. Kant, however is not condoning violence towards animals, he condemns the action.

Kant says "If a man shoots his dog because the animal is no longer capable of service, he does not fail in his duty to the dog … but his act is inhuman and damages in himself that humanity which it is his duty to show towards mankind. ... We can judge the heart of a man by his treatment of animals." (RT 190)

Kant’s view proves that the act of killing the dog is not morally wrong, in and of it self. Killing the dog is wrong because of the impact it has on the way we treat other humans. Kant views our treatment of animals as ref


torture animals because it can lead to the torture of humans. Trough CI #2 Kant grounds his theory by proving that animals are only means and never ends.

I agree with Kant about our moral duties to animals. In my view animals are here for humans to use. There is an enormous difference between the life of humans and other animals. First of all, humans are clearly more significant for the simple reason that they are at the top of food chain. This is what allows people to control society and environment. Combine this with the fact that humans have the ability to reason, and it is clear that people have more significance. I do not believe that cruelty to animals is ever morally permissible. The way a person treats animals is in direct correlation with the way they treat humans. I also believe that the more respect and care you show to an animal the better it will serve you. The better an animal serves as a means the easier it is to accomplish the end.

I fully side with Kant on this issue. Animals are tools and like any tools, they shouldn’t mistreated or misused. When you take care of tools (I.E. animals) they last longer and perform better. Your duty is not to the tool, but to yourself to make the most out your tool and use it in a way that will benefit society. I believe this was Kant’s same basic belief in how we should treat animals.

‘….No matter what the nature of the being, the pri

Some topics in this essay:
Trough CI, , Animals” RT, CInotes CI, Categorical Imperative, duties towards, moral duties animals, moral duties, humans animals, indirect duty, treat animals, towards animals, treat humans, duties animals, duties towards animals, direct moral, indirect duties towards, animals means,

Join now to see the rest of the essay!
Approximate Word count = 960
Approximate Pages = 4 (250 words per page double spaced)


  

More Essays on Kant on moral duties to animals


Professional Papers:
Dow Corning Breast Implants4528 words
Utilitarianism and Kantian Ethics1891 words
Leviticus and the Nature of Sacrifices5130 words
Mankind and Creation4141 words



Student Written Papers:
Kant on moral duties to animals960 words
Human Dignity705 words

Look at even more essays on Kant on moral duties to animals
More Religion Essays

Join Now
(Credit Card)
Join Now
(Online Check)
Join Now
(Phone 1-900)



CUSTOMER SERVICES




Acceptance Essays
Arts
Custom Essays
English
Foreign
History
Miscellaneous
Movies
Music
Novels
People
Politics
Religion
Science
Sports
Technology
Book Notes

 

 


All papers are for research and references purposes only!
Copyright © 2002-2009 ExampleEssays.com DMCA
Saved Papers