Say No to Boycotts
In her essay “Devastating Beauty,” Teal Pfeifer states: “A boycott is the most effective way to rid the print medium of emaciated models and eliminate the harmful effects they cause.” Pfeifer proposes that consumers are in complete control when it comes to marketing the images of thin, beautiful women in magazines. She also explains that if women would stop buying the magazines that publish such images, it would help prevent the people who bear bulimia and anorexia. I disagree with Pfeifer’s boycotting plan because in today’s society, the sexy, thin, gorgeous stereotype is not only in magazines, but it is ubiquitously in movies, television, newspapers, books, and advertisements. With a nation filled with mass media depicting women with a so-called “perfect” figure and a gorgeous face, it is quite hard for a boycott on magazines to be successful. While magazines engulf this stereotypical woman, so do movies, television, billboards, newspapers, books, commercials and the Internet. The media is powerful in a society because it feeds off the demand of consumers. If these magazines were not in demand there would not be such a problem. But, the majority of consumers of magazines such
The best way to solve this issue is not through boycotts. People need to overcome the “ideal” image depicted in the media because most of the time they are only using a skinny, gorgeous woman to sell a product because she is attractive to the human eye. Just like a brand new candy apple red corvette would be instead of an old rusted station wagon sitting in the parking lot at the local gas station. Although boycotting has worked in the past, I think boycotting magazines would be a waste of time. People need to take that time and go to the gym or get advice on how to eat healthier instead of worrying about irrelevant advertisements. If women do not feel good about themselves because of a picture on a magazine, then they should get up off the couch and do something about it. Otherwise, they need to accept themselves and their bodies. What a person is on the inside is more important than how he/she looks on the outside, no matter what size, shape, sex, race, or physical ability. Instead of boycotting these magazines with emaciated models, I think society needs to work on the acceptance of their selves because it builds maturity and respect for one another, and it also sends a powerful message to children that help builds their own self-image. as “Cosmopolitan” and “Glamour” are slim and fit; therefore a boycott would not be very effective to “rid” the harmful effects emaciated models cause. Not
Some topics in this essay:
Teal Pfeifer,
Heart Association,
Obviously Obesity,
,
emaciated models,
eat healthy foods,
boycotting magazines,
obese nation,
movies television,
lose weight,
consumers magazines,
newspapers books,
bulimic anorexic,
eat healthy,
harmful effects,
Join now to see the rest of the essay!
Approximate Word count = 962
Approximate Pages = 4 (250 words per page double spaced)
More Essays on Say No to Boycotts Professional Papers: |
CUSTOMER SERVICES
|
|
Saved Papers
You haven't saved any papers.
|