To determine how ethical deception is, one cannot simply look at the simple facts to make a judgment. Imagine the doctor decides to lie to her patient by stating that he will have a fifty-fifty percent chance of recovering. According to the philosopher, Immanuel Kant’s perspective, the lie is undoubtedly immoral because an unethical person stated it. Kant believes that everyone is born with human dignity, and lying contradicts the part of humans that gives one their moral value. So, if a person is known immoral, a lie that they say will also be unethical. Howeve

r, by telling the truth to the patient, the doctor will fulfill Kant’s concept of being moral, purely because she has integrity. A second perception comes from that of utilitarian ethics. From previous knowledge, if the doctor lies to her patient about his condition, she gives him faith. Utilitarian ethics states that because the patient will have hope to carry on with life contently, there is an overall benefit to the lie. Thus, her deceit is ethical. However, from prior awareness, if the doctor was to be honest and disclose the truth of her patient’s situation, this may lead him to further grief. Utilitarian ethics believes that since the truth will harm the patient instead of benefit him, it is unethical to reveal the truth.

Some topics in this essay:
Isabelle Phyler, Immanuel Kant’s, , doctor decides, role model, utilitarian ethics, role model statistics, fifty-fifty percent chance, previous knowledge, fifty-fifty percent, doctor lies, affect patient, people lying, patient doctor, percent chance,