The case decision has been likened to Brown v. Board of Education and other such triumphs in the face of discrimination, but this case was much different. The law respects the privacy of gays, but the law will rarely be put to use because the matter is just that, private. There will be little change in practice of law, because the issue of sodomy as

I do not know if I agree with gay marriages, but I do believe that heterosexual marriages would be better for raising a child, just as they are better than single parents raising a child. From a child’s point of view, I think it is better to have the perspective of two parents of different sex. I also think there would be more discrimination against a child when they are growing up, which would affect them psychologically, but the discrimination would eventually end in most places as it did with issues of race. In the eyes of the law, this does not justify a decision against gay marriage, but it could be a consideration in other aspects of law. For instance, custody decision or consideration for adoption. Though the parents ability to provide for the child and be a good parent should always be considered the most important.

Overall, I think that the decision of an

Some topics in this essay:
Board Education, Supreme Court, gay marriage, , don’t believe, supreme court, issue gay marriage, issue gay, gay marriages, upheld 1986, raising child, near future, change practice,