voicing their opinions. This is a true reflection of the public opinion. They stated that if the public wants to elect that person than the democratic government has no right to deny their wish. The argument of the term limit then centers on the issue of whether it would promote democracy or hinder it.

Its supporter also stated that term limit is the tradition of American politics. It was stated in the Article of Confederation but was neglected to be put in the Constitution (Coyne and Fund 45). The early American politicians, such as Thomas Jefferson, and James Madison, all followed the tradition of serving under a term limit of two or three. But as the government grew in size, careerists were able to dominate American political life. They disregarded the tradition in pursuit of their own interests. So it is necessary for the term limit to become the federal law or amendment to the Constitution to return America to the pure democracy its Founding Father intended to create (Coyne 46).

They also argued that the term limit obstructed the democratic practices in the United States by restricting who could run for the public office (Feinberg 19). There is no need to such law in the democratic America. The people would replace any ¡°servant¡± of them when they see a need. They have enough power to do that without the aid of a term limit. Instead, it would force the people to choose someone inferior merely because the one whom they trust and has the ability had served more than the term limit allowed (SYWK). How could that be called ¡°Democracy¡± if the people could not even elect the representatives they wanted? It is more of the case when the reason for such is neither lack of ability nor personal impurity but a law that mandated the retirement of the exemplary officials (Feinberg 31). They also argued that the possibility of reelection is what compels politicians to serve the people. If term limits are instituted, there will be little incentive for elected officials to perform well in their last term (SYWK).

The supporter of the reform argued that by setting the ceiling of the maximum of years a person can serve in a position would bring higher efficiency into our government system and further promote the idea of democracy handed down to us by the Founding Fathers. The majority supported the term limit should be about six years (Coyne and Fund 25). The reason the proposal of term limit received such widespread support on the national level is because of the tradition Americans had.

A scandal started the movement for term limit, the scandal of Jim Wright, the once powerful H

Some topics in this essay:
Hyde Gephardt, Hibbing Theiss-Morse, Congressman Senator, Coyne Fund, Citizen Legislature, , Founding Father, term limit, James Madison, House Speaker, Washington Post, coyne fund, elected officials, lack term limit, political life, hibbing theiss-morse, kamber hyde, hyde gephardt, lack term, limit people, kamber hyde gephardt, term limit people, public opinion, term limit allowed, proposal term limit,